EstatePass
ContractsContract ValidityMEDIUM

A contract signed under duress in Delaware is considered:

Correct Answer

B) Voidable at the option of the party who was coerced

A contract signed under duress is voidable, not void. The party who was coerced may choose to affirm or rescind the contract. Unlike a void contract, which has no legal effect from the outset, a voidable contract remains in force until the aggrieved party elects to void it. The contract is not automatically ratified once the duress ends — the coerced party must take affirmative action to either affirm or rescind it.

Answer Options
A
Void and of no legal effect from the beginning
B
Voidable at the option of the party who was coerced
C
Valid and fully enforceable against all parties
D
Automatically ratified once the duress ends

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

void vs. voidable contractscontract rescissionratificationundue influencecontract validity

Key Terms:

voidvoidableduressrescissionratificationcontract validity
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing