A mortgage lender's statistical analysis shows that their denial rate for Native American applicants is 15% higher than for white applicants with similar credit profiles. However, the lender's overall portfolio performance is strong, and they argue this difference reflects unmeasured risk factors. Under current fair lending enforcement standards, this situation would:
Correct Answer
A) Require the lender to demonstrate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the disparity
Significant statistical disparities in lending outcomes between protected classes and control groups create a prima facie case of discrimination under disparate impact theory. The lender must then provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation for the disparity. Portfolio performance alone doesn't justify discriminatory outcomes, and unmeasured risk factors must be specifically identified and validated.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Significant statistical disparities in lending outcomes between protected classes and control groups create a prima facie case of discrimination under disparate impact theory. The lender must then provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation for the disparity. Portfolio performance alone doesn't justify discriminatory outcomes, and unmeasured risk factors must be specifically identified and validated.
More Ethics & Fraud Questions
A lender's mobile app prominently displays a 'pre-qualification' feature that asks for minimal information but generates loan amount estimates that are consistently 20-30% higher than what borrowers actually qualify for when they complete full applications. The app includes a disclaimer that estimates are 'subject to full underwriting.' This practice is most likely:
A mortgage loan originator receives a lead from a real estate agent about a potential borrower. Before calling this consumer, the MLO must:
A mortgage company advertises 'Guaranteed approval for all credit types!' but internally has minimum credit score requirements of 580. This advertisement is problematic because it:
A borrower admits to an MLO that they inflated their income on the initial application but wants to provide correct information now. What should the MLO do?
An MLO's family member works as an appraiser and occasionally appraises properties for the MLO's borrowers through the normal appraisal management company rotation. The MLO never requests this appraiser specifically. Is this arrangement problematic?
A lender offers a mortgage product with a temporary introductory rate that is prominently advertised, but the subsequent rate increase is disclosed only in fine print at the bottom of marketing materials. The lender argues this practice is acceptable because all required disclosures are technically present. Under UDAAP standards, this practice is most likely:
A borrower submits a rental agreement showing $2,500 monthly income from a property they claim to own. Which of the following would be the MOST significant red flag indicating potential rental income fraud?
A borrower inflates their income on a loan application for a vacation home they plan to rent out occasionally but also use personally. The primary motivation is investment return. This scenario constitutes:
An appraisal comes back significantly higher than the contract price with no reasonable explanation. The loan officer should:
A borrower applies for a loan on a property they intend to flip but marks it as owner-occupied to get better loan terms. However, due to market conditions, they end up living in the property for two years before selling. This situation is:
People Also Study
Federal Mortgage-Related Laws
23% of exam
General Mortgage Knowledge
23% of exam
Mortgage Loan Origination Activities
25% of exam
Uniform State Test Content
12% of exam
Related Study Resources
Previous Question
A borrower's employment verification shows they work for a company, but when the MLO calls the main company number, the receptionist has never heard of the borrower. However, the direct number on the verification form reaches someone who confirms employment. This situation suggests:
Next Question
An MLO discovers that a borrower provided accurate information, but the loan processor internally altered the debt-to-income ratio to make the loan appear to qualify. What is the MLO's obligation?