The average marketing time for similar properties in a neighborhood is 120 days. A property was listed 90 days ago at $400,000, reduced to $385,000 after 60 days, and is still on the market. This suggests:
Correct Answer
B) The property may still be overpriced
Since the property has been on the market for 90 days (approaching the 120-day average) despite a price reduction and still hasn't sold, it suggests the property may still be overpriced for current market conditions.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The property has been on market for 90 days, which is 75% of the 120-day average marketing time for similar properties. Despite a $15,000 price reduction (3.75% decrease), the property remains unsold and is approaching the average marketing time. This pattern strongly indicates the property is still priced above what the market will bear, as appropriately priced properties should sell within or below the average marketing time, especially after price adjustments.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The property is appropriately priced
If the property were appropriately priced, it should have sold by now, especially after the price reduction. Properties priced correctly typically sell within or below the average marketing time.
Option C: The market has changed significantly
While market changes can affect marketing time, the fact that we have a current 120-day average for similar properties suggests this data reflects current market conditions. The issue appears to be property-specific pricing rather than market-wide changes.
Option D: The property has unique characteristics
While unique characteristics could affect marketing time, the question provides no evidence of special features. The most logical explanation given the data is pricing issues rather than unique property attributes.
The 90-120 Rule
Remember '90 approaching 120 = still too high' - when a property reaches 75% or more of average marketing time without selling, even with price cuts, it's likely still overpriced.
How to use: When you see marketing time questions, immediately calculate what percentage of average time has elapsed. If it's over 75% and still unsold despite price reductions, think 'still overpriced.'
Exam Tip
Always compare the actual days on market to the average marketing time as a percentage. Look for price reduction history as additional evidence of market resistance to pricing.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Assuming any price reduction means the property is now appropriately priced
- -Not calculating the percentage of average marketing time elapsed
- -Confusing extended marketing time with changing market conditions without supporting evidence
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of market time analysis and pricing indicators in real estate valuation. Marketing time is a critical indicator of whether a property is appropriately priced relative to market conditions. When a property exceeds or approaches the average marketing time for similar properties, even after price reductions, it typically signals pricing issues rather than market acceptance. The relationship between time on market, price adjustments, and eventual sale provides valuable insight into market dynamics and property positioning.
Background Knowledge
Marketing time analysis compares how long a subject property has been on the market versus the average marketing time for similar properties in the area. Properties that exceed average marketing time, especially after price reductions, typically indicate overpricing relative to market conditions.
Real-World Application
Appraisers use marketing time analysis to support their value conclusions and advise clients on pricing strategies. Extended marketing time despite price reductions often leads to recommendations for further price adjustments or investigation of other market factors.
More Market Analysis Questions
Which comparable selection criterion is MOST important when choosing sales for a residential appraisal?
A residential subdivision has absorbed 120 units over the past 18 months. Based on this historical data, how long would it take to sell 80 remaining lots?
Which of the following is the correct sequence for analyzing highest and best use?
A market has 500 homes sold in the past 12 months and currently has 180 homes for sale. The monthly absorption rate is:
When analyzing highest and best use, which of the following would make a use financially infeasible?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Report Writing & Compliance
10% of exam
Previous Question
A property's current use as a gas station is no longer economically viable due to environmental regulations. The property could be converted to retail use for $200,000, generating $180,000 annual net income. The land value for alternative use is $800,000. Using a 9% capitalization rate, what is the value as improved for alternative use?
Next Question
In market area delineation, which factor is MOST important for defining a residential neighborhood boundary?