EstatePass
Valuation PrinciplesMEDIUM25% of exam

An appraiser is reconciling three value indications: Sales Comparison $485,000, Cost Approach $510,000, Income Approach $475,000. The property is a 15-year-old single-family residence in an active market. Which approach should typically receive the most weight?

Correct Answer

C) Sales comparison approach, because it's most relevant for this property type

For single-family residences in active markets, the sales comparison approach typically receives the most weight because there are usually adequate comparable sales and this approach best reflects market behavior for this property type.

Answer Options
A
Cost approach, because it's the highest value
B
Income approach, because it's the most conservative
C
Sales comparison approach, because it's most relevant for this property type
D
All approaches should be weighted equally

Why This Is the Correct Answer

The sales comparison approach receives the most weight for single-family residences in active markets because this property type is frequently traded, providing abundant comparable sales data. Single-family homes are typically purchased by owner-occupants who make decisions based on comparison shopping with similar properties, making the sales comparison approach most reflective of actual market behavior. Active markets ensure that comparable sales are recent and reliable, further supporting the primacy of this approach for residential properties.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Cost approach, because it's the highest value

Selecting an approach simply because it produces the highest value violates appraisal principles and could constitute bias. The weight given to each approach should be based on the reliability and applicability of the data and methodology, not the resulting value indication. This approach would undermine the credibility and objectivity required in professional appraisal practice.

Option B: Income approach, because it's the most conservative

Choosing an approach because it's the most conservative (lowest value) is inappropriate and represents bias toward a particular value conclusion. The income approach also has limited applicability for single-family residences since most are not purchased as investment properties, making this approach less relevant regardless of its conservative nature.

Option D: All approaches should be weighted equally

Equal weighting of all approaches is rarely appropriate and fails to consider the varying reliability and applicability of each approach for different property types. Professional appraisal practice requires the appraiser to analyze which approaches are most reliable and relevant for the specific property and market conditions, then weight them accordingly rather than applying a mechanical equal weighting.

SFR-SCA Rule

Single Family Residence = Sales Comparison Approach gets the most weight. Remember: 'SFR loves SCA' - Single Family Residences love Sales Comparison Approach because families shop by comparing homes.

How to use: When you see a question about reconciliation for single-family homes, immediately think 'SFR-SCA' and look for the answer that emphasizes sales comparison approach, especially if the market is described as active with good comparable sales.

Exam Tip

Look for key phrases like 'single-family residence,' 'active market,' and 'adequate comparable sales' - these are strong indicators that sales comparison approach should receive primary weight in reconciliation questions.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Choosing the approach that gives the highest or lowest value rather than the most reliable approach
  • -Giving equal weight to all approaches without considering property type and market conditions
  • -Overemphasizing the income approach for single-family residences that aren't typically income-producing

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests understanding of the reconciliation process in real estate appraisal, specifically how to weight different approaches based on property type and market conditions. The reconciliation process requires appraisers to analyze the reliability, applicability, and quantity of data available for each approach. For single-family residences in active markets, the sales comparison approach typically provides the most reliable indication of value because these properties are commonly bought and sold, creating abundant comparable sales data. The appraiser must consider which approach best reflects how typical buyers and sellers behave in the market for this specific property type.

Background Knowledge

Appraisers must understand that different approaches to value have varying degrees of reliability and applicability depending on property type, market conditions, and available data. The reconciliation process requires professional judgment to determine appropriate weighting based on these factors rather than mechanical averaging or bias toward particular value indications.

Real-World Application

In practice, when appraising a single-family home in a suburban neighborhood with recent sales, an appraiser might give 70-80% weight to sales comparison, 15-20% to cost approach (as a check), and minimal or no weight to income approach since the property isn't typically viewed as an investment.

reconciliationsales comparison approachsingle-family residenceactive marketweighting approaches

More Valuation Principles Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing