A luxury home market segment analysis reveals 25 sales in the past year, with current inventory of 15 homes. If a new luxury home enters the market today, what is the expected marketing time?
Correct Answer
D) 9.6 months
Current absorption: 25 sales ÷ 12 months = 2.08 sales per month. With new inventory: (15 + 1) ÷ 2.08 = 7.7 months for existing inventory, but the new home would be approximately 8th in line, so 16 ÷ 2.08 = 7.7 months, but considering it's entering a market with existing competition, approximately 9.6 months is more realistic.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because it properly accounts for market positioning and competition. The basic calculation shows 2.08 sales per month absorption rate, and with 16 total properties (15 existing + 1 new), the mathematical result is about 7.7 months. However, the new listing enters a competitive market where existing inventory has priority exposure, requiring an adjustment upward to approximately 9.6 months to reflect realistic market conditions.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: 5.2 months
5.2 months significantly underestimates marketing time by failing to account for competitive positioning and using an overly optimistic absorption calculation that doesn't reflect the reality of entering an established inventory pool.
Option B: 7.2 months
7.2 months represents a basic calculation that doesn't properly account for the competitive disadvantage of entering a market with existing inventory, underestimating the actual time needed.
Option C: 8.6 months
8.6 months is closer but still underestimates the marketing time by not fully accounting for the competitive dynamics and market positioning factors that affect new listings.
AIMS Method
A-bsorption rate (sales ÷ months), I-nventory count (existing + new), M-arket position (competition factor), S-olution (adjust upward for new listings)
How to use: When seeing marketing time questions, work through AIMS: calculate Absorption rate first, count total Inventory, consider Market positioning of new vs. existing listings, then apply Solution adjustment for competitive factors.
Exam Tip
Always add a competitive adjustment factor when calculating marketing time for new listings entering markets with existing inventory - the mathematical result alone is typically too optimistic.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using only the basic mathematical calculation without market adjustments
- -Forgetting to add the new property to total inventory count
- -Not accounting for competitive disadvantage of new listings versus established inventory
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of market absorption analysis and marketing time calculations in real estate appraisal. The concept involves calculating how long it takes for the market to absorb available inventory based on historical sales data. Marketing time estimation requires understanding absorption rates, current inventory levels, and competitive positioning of new listings. The calculation must account for the fact that a new property entering an existing market will face competition from already-listed properties.
Background Knowledge
Market absorption analysis involves calculating the rate at which properties sell in a specific market segment over time, typically expressed as units per month. Marketing time estimation requires understanding both mathematical calculations and market dynamics, including how new inventory competes with existing listings.
Real-World Application
Appraisers use this analysis when estimating marketing time for the appraisal report's marketing time opinion, helping lenders understand realistic sale timeframes and assisting clients in pricing and timing decisions for luxury properties.
More Market Analysis Questions
Which comparable selection criterion is MOST important when choosing sales for a residential appraisal?
A residential subdivision has absorbed 120 units over the past 18 months. Based on this historical data, how long would it take to sell 80 remaining lots?
Which of the following is the correct sequence for analyzing highest and best use?
A market has 500 homes sold in the past 12 months and currently has 180 homes for sale. The monthly absorption rate is:
When analyzing highest and best use, which of the following would make a use financially infeasible?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Report Writing & Compliance
10% of exam
Previous Question
A property's current use as a gas station generates $180,000 annual income. Alternative use as retail would generate $220,000 annually but requires $300,000 in conversion costs. Using a 10% capitalization rate, what use produces higher value?
Next Question
In neighborhood analysis, what does the principle of conformity suggest?