A comparable sale shows a transaction price of $300,000, but the buyer assumed a $20,000 special assessment for street improvements. The cash equivalent value of this sale is:
Correct Answer
C) $320,000
When a buyer assumes a special assessment, the effective price paid is higher than the recorded transaction price. The cash equivalent value is $300,000 + $20,000 = $320,000, representing the total consideration paid by the buyer.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C ($320,000) is correct because it properly calculates the cash equivalent value by adding the assumed special assessment to the transaction price. The buyer's total consideration includes both the $300,000 paid to the seller and the $20,000 special assessment obligation they assumed. This represents the true economic value exchanged in the transaction. From an appraisal perspective, this adjusted figure provides a more accurate basis for comparison with other sales that may not have involved assumed obligations.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: $300,000
Option A is wrong because $300,000 only represents the recorded transaction price and fails to account for the additional $20,000 special assessment that the buyer assumed, understating the true consideration paid.
Option B: $280,000
Option B is wrong because $280,000 incorrectly subtracts the special assessment from the transaction price, when it should be added since the buyer is taking on this additional financial obligation.
Option D: Cannot be determined without additional information
Option D is wrong because sufficient information is provided to calculate the cash equivalent value - we have both the transaction price and the amount of the assumed special assessment, which is all that's needed for this calculation.
ADD for Assumed Debt Duties
Remember 'ADD' - when buyers Assume Debt Duties (like special assessments, liens, or other obligations), you ADD these amounts to the transaction price to get cash equivalent value.
How to use: When you see a question about assumed obligations, immediately think 'ADD' and add the assumed amount to the stated transaction price to find the cash equivalent value.
Exam Tip
Always read carefully for words like 'assumed,' 'took subject to,' or 'buyer responsible for' - these signal that adjustments are needed to calculate cash equivalent value.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Subtracting the assumed obligation instead of adding it to the transaction price
- -Using the recorded transaction price without considering assumed obligations
- -Thinking insufficient information is provided when all necessary data is given
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the fundamental concept of cash equivalent value in real estate appraisal, which requires adjusting transaction prices to reflect the true economic consideration exchanged. When a buyer assumes obligations like special assessments, liens, or other encumbrances, they are effectively paying more than the recorded sale price because they're taking on additional financial responsibility. The cash equivalent value represents what a buyer would have paid if the transaction were conducted entirely in cash without any assumed obligations. This adjustment is crucial for making accurate comparisons between sales in the sales comparison approach to valuation.
Background Knowledge
Cash equivalent value adjustments are essential in the sales comparison approach when comparable sales involve financing concessions, assumed obligations, or non-cash considerations. Appraisers must adjust transaction prices to reflect what would have been paid in an all-cash transaction to ensure accurate comparisons between properties.
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers frequently encounter sales where buyers assume special assessments for improvements, existing liens, or seller financing at below-market rates, requiring cash equivalent adjustments to ensure accurate valuation conclusions.
More Market Analysis Questions
Which comparable selection criterion is MOST important when choosing sales for a residential appraisal?
A residential subdivision has absorbed 120 units over the past 18 months. Based on this historical data, how long would it take to sell 80 remaining lots?
Which of the following is the correct sequence for analyzing highest and best use?
A market has 500 homes sold in the past 12 months and currently has 180 homes for sale. The monthly absorption rate is:
When analyzing highest and best use, which of the following would make a use financially infeasible?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Report Writing & Compliance
10% of exam