A comparable sale had seller financing with a below-market interest rate that saved the buyer approximately $15,000 in present value. How should this be treated in the sales comparison approach?
Correct Answer
B) Adjust the comparable downward by $15,000
When a comparable sale includes favorable financing terms, the sale price is typically higher than it would have been with market-rate financing. The comparable should be adjusted downward to reflect what it would have sold for with typical financing.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because favorable financing inflates the sale price above what it would have been with market-rate financing. Since the buyer saved $15,000 in present value through below-market financing, they likely paid approximately $15,000 more for the property than they would have with conventional financing. To make this comparable useful for valuing the subject property (which presumably will have market-rate financing), we must adjust the sale price downward by $15,000 to reflect what it would have sold for under typical financing conditions.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: No adjustment needed
No adjustment would be incorrect because favorable financing directly impacts the sale price and must be accounted for to make the comparable useful for valuation purposes.
Option C: Adjust the comparable upward by $15,000
Adjusting upward would be backwards - favorable financing already inflated the price, so we need to remove that inflation, not add to it.
Option D: Exclude the comparable from analysis
Excluding the comparable would waste valuable market data when a simple adjustment can make it useful for the analysis.
The Financing Flip Rule
Remember 'FLIP': Favorable financing = Lower the comparable price, Inferior financing = Price goes up. If the financing helped the buyer (favorable), flip it down. If the financing hurt the buyer (above market rates), flip it up.
How to use: When you see a financing adjustment question, identify if the financing was favorable or unfavorable to the buyer, then FLIP the adjustment in the opposite direction to normalize the comparable.
Exam Tip
Always read financing adjustment questions carefully to identify the direction of the benefit - if financing saved the buyer money, adjust the comparable price downward by that amount.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Confusing the direction of adjustment - thinking favorable financing should increase the comparable price
- -Ignoring financing adjustments entirely when they significantly impact sale prices
- -Applying the adjustment to the subject property instead of the comparable sale
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of financing adjustments in the sales comparison approach, specifically how favorable seller financing affects comparable sales prices. When a seller provides below-market interest rate financing, buyers are willing to pay a premium for the property because they're receiving a financial benefit through reduced borrowing costs. The sales comparison approach requires adjusting comparables to reflect what they would have sold for under typical market conditions, including standard financing terms. The $15,000 present value savings represents the premium the buyer paid above market value to obtain the favorable financing.
Background Knowledge
The sales comparison approach requires all comparables to be adjusted to reflect the same financing conditions as the subject property. When comparables have non-typical financing (seller financing, below-market rates, cash sales, etc.), adjustments must be made to normalize the data. Favorable financing terms typically result in higher sale prices because buyers capitalize the financing benefit into the purchase price.
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers frequently encounter seller-financed sales, especially in markets where buyers have difficulty obtaining conventional financing. These sales often occur at premium prices, and appraisers must adjust them downward to reflect market value under typical financing conditions when appraising properties that will use conventional loans.
More Market Analysis Questions
Which comparable selection criterion is MOST important when choosing sales for a residential appraisal?
A residential subdivision has absorbed 120 units over the past 18 months. Based on this historical data, how long would it take to sell 80 remaining lots?
Which of the following is the correct sequence for analyzing highest and best use?
A market has 500 homes sold in the past 12 months and currently has 180 homes for sale. The monthly absorption rate is:
When analyzing highest and best use, which of the following would make a use financially infeasible?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Report Writing & Compliance
10% of exam
Previous Question
A property currently operates as a restaurant but is zoned for residential use only. In the highest and best use analysis, this property fails which test?
Next Question
A neighborhood analysis reveals that 65% of recent buyers are first-time homebuyers aged 25-35 with household incomes between $75,000-$100,000. This information is MOST useful for: