A seller’s broker needs to disclose:
Question & Answer
Review the question and all answer choices
the broker’s acquisition of any direct or indirect interest in the seller’s property. b. whether any person holding a special relationship with the broker will acquire an interest in the seller’s property.
Option A is incomplete because it only addresses the broker's own interest but fails to include the requirement to disclose interests held by persons with special relationships to the broker, which is also mandated by California law.
whether any person holding a special relationship with the broker will acquire an interest in the seller’s property. c. Both a. and b.
Option B is incomplete because it only addresses disclosure regarding persons with special relationships to the broker but fails to include the requirement to disclose the broker's own direct or indirect interest in the property.
Both a. and
Neither a. nor b.
Option D is incorrect because California law explicitly requires brokers to disclose both their own interests in a property and those of persons with special relationships to them. Failure to disclose creates potential legal liability.
Why is this correct?
Option C is correct because California law requires brokers to disclose both their own direct or indirect interest in the property (A) and whether any person with a special relationship to the broker will acquire an interest (B). This dual disclosure requirement ensures complete transparency between brokers and their clients.
Deep Analysis
AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept
This question tests your understanding of agency disclosure requirements in California real estate practice. The concept of disclosure is fundamental to maintaining transparency and protecting clients' interests in transactions. The question specifically focuses on what a seller's broker must disclose regarding their own potential interest in the property. The core concept here revolves around the broker's fiduciary duty and the requirement to avoid any conflicts of interest. Option A addresses the broker's direct or indirect interest in the property, while Option B extends this to anyone with a special relationship to the broker. California law requires brokers to disclose both types of potential interests to ensure full transparency with their clients. This question is straightforward but tests whether you understand that brokers must disclose both their own interests and those of closely associated parties. This connects to broader concepts of agency relationships, fiduciary duties, and disclosure requirements that protect consumers in real transactions.
Knowledge Background
Essential context and foundational knowledge
Disclosure requirements in agency relationships stem from the fundamental fiduciary duty that brokers owe to their clients. In California, Business and Professions Code Section 10149 mandates that brokers must disclose any interest they or their immediate family have in a property they are selling. This extends to any entity in which the broker has a controlling interest. The purpose of these disclosure requirements is to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that clients can make informed decisions. These rules are part of California's broader consumer protection framework in real estate transactions, which aims to create transparency and prevent fraud or misrepresentation.
BROKER: B - Broker's own interest, R - Relationships with others, O - Obligation to disclose, K - Keep transparent, E - Ensure client awareness, R - Relationships matter
When encountering a disclosure question, think BROKER to remember what must be disclosed: the broker's own interest and any relationships that might create conflicts
For agency disclosure questions, remember that brokers must always disclose their own interests AND those of people with special relationships to them. If both are mentioned in options, that's likely the correct answer.
Real World Application
How this concept applies in actual real estate practice
Imagine Sarah, a listing broker, discovers that her brother-in-law wants to purchase the property she's listing for the Johnson family. If Sarah doesn't disclose both her familial relationship and her brother-in-law's potential interest to the Johnsons before they sign the listing agreement, she would be violating California disclosure laws. This could lead to legal consequences if the Johnsons later discover this relationship and feel they didn't receive full transparency, potentially resulting in the loss of their commission or even a lawsuit for damages.
Continue Learning
Explore this topic in different formats
More Agency Law Videos
Continue learning with related video lessons
In Washington, dual agency requires:
3-5 min • 0 views
Connecticut real estate licensees are regulated by the:
3-5 min • 0 views
A broker provides services to both a buyer and a seller in a transaction without disclosing their dual agency status. This is an example of:
3-5 min • 0 views
Ohio requires how many hours of pre-license education for salespersons?
3-5 min • 0 views
Georgia's continuing education requirement for license renewal is:
3-5 min • 0 views
Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?
Access 2,000+ free video lessons covering all 11 exam topics.