EstatePass
Mandated DisclosuresEnvironmental_disclosures_chapter_21eHARD

Patricia is a licensed broker in Massachusetts who recently sold a residential property. The buyer, Thomas, later discovers that the property has a Chapter 21E petroleum release that was documented in MassDEP's public database before the sale closed. Patricia claims she was unaware of the contamination and never searched the MassDEP database. Thomas files a complaint under MGL Chapter 93A. Which of the following best describes the likely outcome of Thomas's Chapter 93A claim against Patricia?

Correct Answer

B) Patricia may be found liable under Chapter 93A if her failure to check publicly available MassDEP records constitutes a negligent omission rising to the level of an unfair or deceptive practice.

MGL Chapter 93A prohibits unfair or deceptive acts and practices in trade or commerce. Massachusetts courts and the Board have recognized that a licensee's failure to exercise reasonable diligence — including checking publicly available MassDEP records for a known environmental database — can constitute a negligent omission that rises to the level of an unfair or deceptive practice under Chapter 93A, even without intentional fraud. Because MassDEP's database is publicly accessible and checking it is within the scope of a competent licensee's due diligence, Patricia's failure to do so creates meaningful exposure. If found liable, Thomas could recover actual damages plus potentially double or treble damages and attorney's fees under Chapter 93A.

Answer Options
A
Patricia has no liability because she had no actual knowledge of the contamination and is not the property owner responsible under Chapter 21E.
B
Patricia may be found liable under Chapter 93A if her failure to check publicly available MassDEP records constitutes a negligent omission rising to the level of an unfair or deceptive practice.
C
Patricia is automatically liable under Chapter 93A because any undisclosed environmental condition on a sold property triggers strict liability for the listing broker.
D
Patricia is liable only if Thomas can prove she intentionally concealed the contamination with fraudulent intent.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Mandated Disclosures Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Mandated Disclosures

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Mandated Disclosures

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

chapter_93achapter_21enegligent_omissionunfair_deceptive_practicebroker_liabilitymassdep_databasedue_diligence
Was this explanation helpful?

More Mandated Disclosures Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing