EstatePass
Mandated DisclosuresSeller_disclosuresHARD

Sandra is selling her beachfront home in Rehoboth Beach, Sussex County, Delaware. The property sits adjacent to tidal wetlands. Sandra is aware that a portion of her rear yard was identified as regulated tidal wetland in a state survey conducted five years ago, which restricts any grading, filling, or construction in that area. Sandra does not disclose this restriction on her disclosure form, reasoning that it is a matter of public record and the buyer's agent can discover it through due diligence. The buyer closes on the property and later discovers the wetlands restriction prevents the deck expansion he planned. Which of the following most accurately describes Sandra's disclosure obligation and potential liability under Delaware law?

Correct Answer

A) Sandra was required to disclose the known wetlands restriction as a material fact affecting the property's use and value, and her failure to do so may expose her to liability for damages or rescission regardless of the restriction's public record status

Under the Delaware Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (6 Del. C. § 2570 et seq.) and Delaware's public trust and environmental disclosure principles, a seller must disclose known material facts that affect the property's use, value, or marketability — including known governmental or environmental use restrictions such as tidal wetlands designations. The fact that a restriction is theoretically discoverable in public records does not eliminate the seller's duty to disclose what she personally knows. Sandra had actual knowledge of the wetlands restriction from the state survey, and that restriction materially affects the buyer's ability to use the property as intended. Her failure to disclose creates exposure to civil liability for damages or contract rescission. Delaware's Wetlands Act (7 Del. C. Chapter 66) and the Coastal Zone Act further underscore the significance of environmental restrictions on coastal properties, and licensees and sellers in Delaware's beach communities must be especially attentive to these disclosure obligations.

Answer Options
A
Sandra was required to disclose the known wetlands restriction as a material fact affecting the property's use and value, and her failure to do so may expose her to liability for damages or rescission regardless of the restriction's public record status
B
Sandra had no disclosure obligation because wetlands restrictions are governmental regulations available in public records, and buyers are presumed to have constructive notice of all recorded governmental restrictions
C
Sandra's obligation was satisfied because she disclosed the property's coastal location on the form, which implies awareness of potential environmental restrictions to a reasonable buyer
D
Sandra had no disclosure obligation because the restriction affects only a portion of the yard and does not render the entire property unmarketable or uninhabitable

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Mandated Disclosures Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Mandated Disclosures

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Mandated Disclosures

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

seller_disclosurewetlandscoastal_zonematerial_factsussex_countyenvironmental_restrictionactual_knowledge
Was this explanation helpful?

More Mandated Disclosures Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing