A buyer takes possession of a California property and pays $60,000 toward the purchase price under an oral agreement with the seller. When the seller refuses to complete the sale, the buyer sues to enforce the agreement. The seller raises the Statute of Frauds as a defense. How would a California court MOST likely rule?
Correct Answer
A) The court may enforce the agreement if the buyer's payment and possession sufficiently establish part performance
California Civil Code §1624 requires real property contracts to be in writing, but courts recognize the doctrine of part performance as an equitable exception. When a party has paid toward the purchase price and taken possession in reliance on an oral agreement, strict application of the Statute of Frauds would itself produce fraud. California courts, following the reasoning in Monarco v. Lo Greco (1950) 35 Cal.2d 621, may enforce such agreements where the acts of performance are clearly referable to the oral contract and would cause unjust enrichment if the defense were allowed.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question
Background Knowledge for Contracts
Real World Application in Contracts
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
Related Concepts
The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed to be enforceable. In real estate, all contracts for the sale of land or interests in land must be in writing.
A time is of the essence clause in a contract means that all deadlines and dates specified in the agreement are strictly enforceable, and failure to meet them constitutes a material breach.
An appraisal contingency allows the buyer to cancel or renegotiate the contract if the property's appraised value comes in lower than the agreed-upon purchase price. This contingency protects buyers from overpaying.
More Contracts Questions
Which of the following is required for a valid contract in California?
An “as is” clause in a general purchase contract:
A contract formed for an illegal purpose is considered:
After a residential purchase contract has been signed by both parties in Illinois, the buyer and seller verbally agree to change the closing date. What is the legally sound way to document this change?
Specific performance in North Dakota:
- → In a contract for deed (land contract), who retains legal title to the property until the purchase price is fully paid?
- → Which of the following is NOT required for a valid bill of sale?
- → A Nevada real estate salesperson is helping a buyer draft a purchase agreement. Which of the following is NOT a required element for a Nevada residential purchase agreement to be legally enforceable?
- → Sawyer Iverson is reviewing an Illinois issue in Joliet. The person assumes that attorney review automatically replaces every inspection, appraisal, or financing deadline in a standard Illinois residential contract. Which statement best applies?
- → Tom and Linda sign a purchase agreement for a home in Hartford, Connecticut. The agreement includes a financing contingency stating that if Tom cannot obtain a mortgage commitment within 21 days, either party may void the contract. On day 19, Tom's lender issues a written mortgage commitment. On day 22, Tom changes his mind and tries to void the contract by claiming the financing contingency was not satisfied. Which of the following best describes the legal status of the contract?
- → Avery Jenkins is reviewing an Illinois issue in Normal. The person asks what happens if neither attorney sends a disapproval or proposed change during the standard review period. Which statement best applies?
- → Under Montana law, a purchase agreement for residential real property becomes legally binding on the seller when which of the following occurs?
- → Johnny wants the seller's patio furniture included in his purchase of a house. Before the offer is signed and delivered to the seller, he asks his agent to attach a page covering the furniture to the offer. That attached page is best described as:
- → A bilateral contract in real estate is best described as:
- → A contract where one party uses threats to force the other party to sign is considered:
People Also Study
Buyer Representation Agreement
8% of exam
Property Ownership
10% of exam
Land Use Controls and Regulations
8% of exam
Valuation and Market Analysis
10% of exam
Related Articles
Real Estate Exam Practice Questions by Topic (2026): Free Sets for Contracts, Agency, Financing
Get topic-based real estate exam practice sets and a simple sequence to move from learning to timed mocks.
Real Estate Exam Topics (2026): High-Yield Areas + Common Traps (Contracts, Agency, Financing, Fair Housing)
Learn the highest-frequency real estate exam topics and the traps that cause most wrong answers—plus how to study them.
Real Estate Exam Contracts: The Only Guide You Need (2026) + Practice Questions
Learn the contract rules the exam loves, common trick wording, and how to practice contract questions efficiently.