An owner sold a parcel of real estate to a buyer with the stipulation that the buyer was not allowed to sell alcohol from the prem- ises. The buyer sold the property 10 years later to a buyer who converted the build- ing into a convenience store that sold beer. Should the owner or owner’s heirs claim a right of re-entry, what would be the basis for the lawsuit?
Audio Lesson
Duration: 2:46
Question & Answer
Review the question and all answer choices
Violation of a covenant
A covenant runs with the land and is enforceable between parties, but doesn't create a right of re-entry. It's a promise to do or not do something, with damages as the typical remedy, not property reclamation.
Violation of a condition subsequent
Violation of a condition precedent
A condition precedent must occur before ownership transfers or becomes effective. Here, the alcohol restriction didn't need to be fulfilled for ownership to transfer; it was a limitation on future use, not a prerequisite for transfer.
Violation of the statute of frauds
The statute of frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing, but this isn't about the validity of the agreement's formation. The restriction was properly established, and the issue is its violation and remedy.
Why is this correct?
B is correct because a condition subsequent creates a right of re-entry for the grantor if the specified condition is violated, which requires affirmative action to enforce. The original owner's restriction on alcohol sales fits this definition, and its violation gives them or their heirs the right to reclaim the property through legal action.
Deep Analysis
AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept
This question tests understanding of property restrictions and remedies for their violation, which is crucial in real estate practice. The core concept involves distinguishing between different types of property restrictions and their enforcement mechanisms. In this scenario, the original owner placed a restriction on alcohol sales, which was violated when the property was converted to sell beer. To answer correctly, we must identify whether this restriction was a covenant, condition subsequent, condition precedent, or statute of frauds issue. The key is recognizing that a condition subsequent gives the grantor a right of re-entry if violated, requiring affirmative action to reclaim the property. This question is challenging because it requires precise knowledge of property law terminology and distinctions between similar concepts. Understanding this helps real estate professionals draft appropriate restrictions in purchase agreements and advise clients on enforcement options when restrictions are violated.
Knowledge Background
Essential context and foundational knowledge
Property restrictions fall into several categories with different enforcement mechanisms. A condition subsequent is a limitation on ownership that, if violated, gives the grantor a right to reclaim the property through legal action (right of entry). This differs from a covenant, which creates a continuing obligation between parties, typically enforced through damages. Conditions precedent must occur before ownership can transfer or become effective. These distinctions are crucial in property law as they determine both the nature of the restriction and the remedies available when violated. Understanding these concepts helps draft appropriate restrictions in deeds and purchase agreements.
Think of a condition subsequent like a 'museum pass' with rules: 'You can visit as long as you don't touch the art.' If you touch it (violate the condition), the museum has the right to escort you out (right of re-entry) but must take action to do so.
When encountering property restrictions, ask: 'Is this a promise (covenant) or a rule with a right to reclaim if broken (condition subsequent)?'
For property restriction questions, identify the remedy: right to reclaim property = condition subsequent; damages = covenant; must occur before transfer = condition precedent.
Real World Application
How this concept applies in actual real estate practice
A real estate agent lists a property with a deed restriction prohibiting commercial use. The buyer, unaware of this restriction, purchases the property and opens a small retail shop. When the original owner discovers this violation, they contact the agent for advice. The agent explains that this is likely a condition subsequent, giving the original owner a right of re-entry. The agent advises the current owner to either cease commercial operations or negotiate with the original owner for a modification of the restriction, as failure to address this could result in legal action and potential loss of the property.
More Property Ownership Episodes
Continue learning with related audio lessons
The rights of ownership, including the right to use, possess, enjoy, and dispose of a thing in any legal way so as to exclude everyone else without rights from interfering, are called
3:10 • 0 plays
Recording of deeds in Alabama is done at the:
2:08 • 0 plays
Which of these characteristics does NOT describe a fee simple estate?
2:42 • 0 plays
New York recognizes which form of marital property ownership?
2:34 • 0 plays
Tenancy by the entirety in Delaware:
2:33 • 0 plays
Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?
Access 2,499+ free podcast episodes covering all 11 exam topics.