Property OwnershipHARDFREE

A woman possesses a fee simple estate. Which of the follow can she NOT do to the property?

3:01
0 plays

Audio Lesson

Duration: 3:01

Question & Answer

Review the question and all answer choices

A

Sell it

CORRECT_ANSWER

B

Subdivide it

CORRECT_ANSWER

C

Use it contrary to zoning regulations

Correct Answer
D

Will it

CORRECT_ANSWER

Why is this correct?

A fee simple owner cannot use property contrary to zoning regulations because zoning is an exercise of police power, which restricts how property can be used even by the owner. This governmental limitation applies regardless of the type of ownership interest.

Deep Analysis

AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept

This question addresses the fundamental limitation of fee simple ownership, which is crucial for real estate professionals to understand. Fee simple is considered the most complete form of property ownership, yet even this absolute ownership is subject to government regulation. The question tests whether students recognize that property rights are not absolute but exist within a legal framework. The correct answer highlights the concept of police power - the government's authority to regulate land use for public welfare. This principle affects every real transaction, as agents must advise clients about permissible property uses. The question is challenging because it contrasts the broad rights associated with fee simple with the restrictions imposed by zoning, forcing students to understand that ownership doesn't equate to unlimited control.

Knowledge Background

Essential context and foundational knowledge

Fee simple absolute is the most complete form of property ownership, giving the owner the fullest bundle of rights possible. However, these rights are not absolute but are subject to limitations. Zoning regulations represent one of the most significant limitations, implemented through police power - the government's authority to enact regulations to protect public health, safety, morals, and general welfare. This concept originated from the landmark case Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926) where the Supreme Court upheld zoning as a valid exercise of police power.

Memory Technique
analogy

Think of fee simple ownership like owning a car - you have the right to sell it, modify it, or leave it to someone in your will, but you can't drive it the wrong way on a highway just because it's yours.

When encountering questions about property rights limitations, mentally compare property ownership to car ownership - both have fundamental rules you must follow regardless of ownership.

Exam Tip

When questions ask about what owners 'cannot do,' look for answers that reference government regulations like zoning, building codes, or environmental restrictions, as these limit even the most complete ownership interests.

Real World Application

How this concept applies in actual real estate practice

A client purchases a fee simple property in a residential zone with dreams of opening a restaurant. As their agent, you must explain that while they own the property outright, the zoning ordinance prohibits commercial uses in that area. They would need to apply for a variance or rezoning, which isn't guaranteed. This scenario illustrates how even complete ownership doesn't override regulatory restrictions, which agents must communicate to avoid client expectations that can't be fulfilled.

Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?

Access 2,499+ free podcast episodes covering all 11 exam topics.