Real Estate FinancingEASYFREE

The term escheat refers to the

1:44
0 plays

Audio Lesson

Duration: 1:44

Question & Answer

Review the question and all answer choices

A

feudal custom of the king’s seizure of

Correct Answer
B

right of the government to take private

This option describes eminent domain, not escheat. While the government may acquire property through both processes, eminent domain requires compensation for public use, whereas escheat occurs without compensation when no heirs exist.

C

acquisition of title by adverse

This describes adverse possession, where someone gains title through continuous, open, and hostile possession of another's property for a statutory period, completely different from escheat.

D

right of the government to acquire title

This is similar to B and incorrectly frames escheat as a government right rather than a historical reversion process. Escheat isn't an acquisition but a reversion when ownership lines end.

Why is this correct?

CORRECT_ANSWER

Deep Analysis

AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept

Understanding escheat is crucial for real estate professionals because it affects property ownership, estate planning, and property management. This question tests knowledge of historical property concepts that still have modern legal implications. The core concept is escheat, which refers to property reverting to the state when there's no legal heir. Option A correctly identifies escheat's historical origins as a feudal custom where the king would seize property. Option B is partially correct but misses the historical context, while C and D confuse escheat with eminent domain or adverse possession. This question is challenging because it blends historical property law with modern applications, and students often confuse escheat with government takings under eminent domain. Understanding escheat connects to broader real estate knowledge about property rights, estates in land, and government powers.

Knowledge Background

Essential context and foundational knowledge

Escheat originates from feudal English law where all property ultimately belonged to the king. When a tenant died without heirs, the land would 'escheat' or revert to the lord (ultimately the king). This principle evolved into modern law where property reverts to the state when someone dies without heirs or a valid will. Most states have escheat statutes that require property to be transferred to the state treasury after a certain period if unclaimed. This prevents property from becoming ownerless and ensures the state maintains orderly property records.

Memory Technique
story

Imagine a king in a castle looking down at his kingdom. When a landowner dies without children, the king extends his hand and the property 'falls back' into his possession - it escheats or reverts to the crown.

Visualize property 'falling back' to a higher authority when ownership lines end. This image helps distinguish escheat from other property concepts.

Exam Tip

When questions mention property reverting to the state without heirs, think 'escheat.' Distinguish it from eminent domain (with compensation) and adverse possession (through possession).

Real World Application

How this concept applies in actual real estate practice

A real estate agent lists a property where the elderly owner passes away unexpectedly. The owner had no spouse, children, or known relatives. After probate proceedings, no valid will is found, and no heirs come forward. The property remains unsold for over a year. The agent must understand that eventually, through escheat proceedings, the property will revert to the state if no heirs are identified. This knowledge helps the agent advise clients about proper estate planning to prevent unintended escheat.

Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?

Access 2,499+ free podcast episodes covering all 11 exam topics.