ContractsEASYFREE

Earnest money in South Carolina must be:

2:58
0 plays

Audio Lesson

Duration: 2:58

Question & Answer

Review the question and all answer choices

A

Held by seller

Option A is incorrect because South Carolina does not allow sellers to directly hold earnest money. This creates potential commingling issues and liability concerns, which is why escrow arrangements are mandated.

B

Deposited in escrow per contract terms

Correct Answer
C

Given to buyer

Option C is incorrect because it defies the purpose of earnest money. Buyers provide this money to demonstrate good faith, not to give it to themselves. This option represents a fundamental misunderstanding of earnest money purpose.

D

No requirements

Option D is incorrect because South Carolina does have specific requirements for earnest money handling. The state mandates proper escrow arrangements to protect transaction participants.

Why is this correct?

Option B is correct because South Carolina law requires earnest money to be deposited in escrow according to the contract terms. This protects both buyer and seller, ensuring proper handling and accounting of the funds throughout the transaction process.

Deep Analysis

AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept

Earnest money is a critical component of real estate transactions, serving as evidence of the buyer's good faith intention to purchase property. This concept matters because it protects both parties in a transaction while demonstrating commitment. The question focuses on South Carolina requirements for earnest money handling. Breaking down the options, we see that while the seller might temporarily hold the funds, South Carolina law requires proper escrow arrangements according to contract terms. Option A is incorrect because holding funds directly by the seller creates potential liability and doesn't provide the protection escrow offers. Option C is illogical as the buyer wouldn't give earnest money to themselves. Option D is incorrect because South Carolina does have requirements. The correct answer B reflects the industry standard and legal requirement that earnest money be placed in escrow as specified in the purchase agreement, protecting both parties and ensuring proper handling of these funds.

Knowledge Background

Essential context and foundational knowledge

Earnest money originated as a common law practice to demonstrate a buyer's serious intent to purchase property. In South Carolina, as in most states, these funds serve as a financial commitment and may be applied to the down payment or closing costs if the transaction closes successfully. The requirement for escrow deposit exists to prevent commingling of funds and provide proper accounting. If the transaction fails, the disposition of earnest money depends on contract terms and applicable contingencies. This regulation protects both parties by ensuring funds are properly handled and accounted for throughout the transaction process.

Memory Technique
analogy

Think of earnest money in escrow like a referee in a sports game. The referee doesn't favor either team but ensures the rules are followed and the game proceeds fairly.

When encountering earnest money questions, visualize this referee to remember that escrow protects both parties by ensuring proper handling according to the rules (contract terms).

Exam Tip

For earnest money questions, remember the key principle: proper escrow is required by law in most states. If an option suggests funds can be held directly by a party without escrow, it's likely incorrect unless state-specific exceptions apply.

Real World Application

How this concept applies in actual real estate practice

A buyer submits an offer on a $300,000 home in Charleston with $10,000 earnest money. The listing agent explains that per South Carolina requirements, the funds will be deposited into a neutral escrow account within three business days. When the inspection reveals major issues, the buyer considers backing out. Because the contract includes an inspection contingency, the earnest money is returned to the buyer. If the buyer had backed out without a valid contingency, the seller could have kept the funds as liquidated damages.

Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?

Access 2,499+ free podcast episodes covering all 11 exam topics.