Dual agency occurs when:
Audio Lesson
Duration: 2:45
Question & Answer
Review the question and all answer choices
Two agents work in the same office
Option A is incorrect because two agents working in the same office does not constitute dual agency. This is simply co-agency or working in the same brokerage. Dual agency requires representation of both buyer and seller by the same agent or brokerage.
One agent represents both buyer and seller
The agent has two listings
Option C is incorrect because having two listings means the agent represents two different sellers, not a buyer and seller. This is not dual agency but rather multiple representation of sellers, which may create other conflicts but is not the same as dual agency.
The buyer uses two agents
Option D is incorrect because a buyer using two agents is not dual agency. This is simply buyer agency shopping or using multiple agents to find properties, which doesn't create the conflict inherent in dual agency.
Why is this correct?
Option B is correct because dual agency specifically occurs when one agent or brokerage represents both the buyer and seller in the same transaction. This creates a fundamental conflict of interest where the agent cannot fully represent either party's best interests simultaneously.
Deep Analysis
AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept
Agency relationships form the foundation of real estate transactions, defining the responsibilities and obligations between parties. Understanding dual agency is crucial because it represents a significant conflict of interest scenario that can jeopardize a transaction and lead to legal consequences. The question tests your comprehension of agency relationships by presenting scenarios that sound similar to dual agency but aren't. Option B correctly identifies dual agency as a situation where one agent represents both buyer and seller. This creates inherent conflicts because the agent must remain loyal to both parties simultaneously - an impossible fiduciary duty. The other options describe different situations: A describes co-agency or working in the same office, C represents having multiple listings, and D describes buyer agency shopping. This question is challenging because it requires precise knowledge of agency terminology and the ability to distinguish between similar-sounding scenarios. Understanding this concept connects to broader knowledge about fiduciary duties, disclosure requirements, and state-specific regulations regarding agency relationships.
Knowledge Background
Essential context and foundational knowledge
Dual agency emerged as a significant issue in real estate as agency relationships became more formalized. Most states now regulate dual agency because of the inherent conflict of interest it creates. When representing both parties, an agent cannot fully advocate for either side, potentially leading to reduced negotiating power for both buyer and seller. Many states require written disclosure and consent from both parties before dual agency can occur, and some states prohibit it entirely. Understanding dual agency requires knowing the fiduciary duties owed to clients - loyalty, confidentiality, obedience, disclosure, accounting, and reasonable care - which become impossible to fulfill simultaneously when representing both buyer and seller.
Think of dual agency as trying to be both the lawyer and the judge in the same case - you can't effectively represent both sides while also presiding over the process.
When encountering questions about agency relationships, ask yourself: 'Is one person trying to represent both sides of the transaction?' If yes, it's likely dual agency.
Look for the phrase 'one agent representing both sides' as the key identifier for dual agency. Other options that mention multiple agents or listings are likely distractors testing your precise understanding of agency terminology.
Real World Application
How this concept applies in actual real estate practice
Imagine a buyer and seller who both want to work with ABC Realty. Sarah, a top-producing agent at ABC, has been working with the buyer for two months showing properties. Meanwhile, the seller contacts ABC Realty and is assigned to Sarah's colleague. However, the seller specifically requests to work with Sarah because she's familiar with their property type. The broker designates Sarah as dual agent. She must obtain written informed consent from both parties, clearly explaining the limitations on her representation. She can no longer provide confidential information to either party about the other's negotiating position or motivation. This scenario highlights how dual agency can occur even without intentional conflict and the importance of proper disclosure.
More Agency Law Episodes
Continue learning with related audio lessons
In Washington, dual agency requires:
2:35 • 0 plays
Missouri requires agency disclosure:
2:11 • 0 plays
Connecticut real estate licensees are regulated by the:
2:35 • 0 plays
A broker provides services to both a buyer and a seller in a transaction without disclosing their dual agency status. This is an example of:
2:27 • 0 plays
North Carolina does NOT recognize which type of agency?
3:06 • 0 plays
Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?
Access 2,499+ free podcast episodes covering all 11 exam topics.