All correctly describe listing brokers and property managers except:
Audio Lesson
Duration: 3:34
Question & Answer
Review the question and all answer choices
Both owe fiduciary duties to principals
A is incorrect because both listing brokers and property managers owe fiduciary duties to their principals. This includes duties of loyalty, obedience, disclosure, confidentiality, accounting, and reasonable care. These fundamental duties apply regardless of whether the broker is handling sales transactions or property management.
Both must supervise associate licensees
B is incorrect because both listing brokers and property managers have the responsibility to supervise their associate licensees. California Business and Professions Code requires brokers to exercise reasonable supervision over all licensees associated with their brokerage, regardless of the broker's primary role.
Both typically have limited authority to bind principals
Listing broker is special agent; property manager is general agent
D is correct in stating that listing brokers typically act as special agents with authority limited to specific transactions, while property managers often function as general agents with ongoing authority to act on behalf of the principal. This accurately describes the typical agency relationships in these roles.
Deep Analysis
AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept
Understanding the distinctions between listing brokers and property managers is crucial for real estate professionals in California, as these roles involve different types of agency relationships and authority levels. This question tests your knowledge of agency law fundamentals, specifically the differences in authority between these two broker positions. The correct answer (C) highlights that listing brokers typically have limited authority to bind principals, while property managers generally have broader authority. Option D correctly identifies that listing brokers typically act as special agents with authority limited to specific transactions, while property managers often function as general agents with ongoing authority. The challenge in this question lies in recognizing that while both positions involve fiduciary duties (A) and supervision responsibilities (B), their authority scopes differ significantly. This knowledge is essential for understanding liability, contract formation, and the practical aspects of representing clients in different real estate scenarios.
Knowledge Background
Essential context and foundational knowledge
In California real estate practice, agency relationships are defined by the scope of authority granted to the broker. Listing brokers typically serve as special agents, with authority limited to the specific terms outlined in the listing agreement. Property managers often function as general agents, with broader authority to make decisions and bind the principal in day-to-day matters. This distinction affects liability, contract formation, and the extent of authority a broker can exercise. California's real estate law, particularly the Business and Professions Code and regulations from the Bureau of Real Estate, governs these relationships and defines the responsibilities and limitations of each role.
Think of a listing broker like a taxi driver hired for a specific trip - they only have authority for that particular journey. A property manager is like building superintendent - they have ongoing authority to handle various decisions day-to-day.
When comparing these broker roles, visualize the taxi driver vs. superintendent analogy to remember the difference in authority scope.
When comparing broker roles, focus on the scope of authority: listing brokers (special agents) have limited, transaction-specific authority, while property managers (general agents) have broader, ongoing authority to bind principals.
Real World Application
How this concept applies in actual real estate practice
Imagine a property owner hires a listing broker to sell their home and separately contracts with a property manager to handle rental units. When showing the home, the listing broker can only negotiate within the listing agreement terms. Meanwhile, the property manager signs a maintenance contract for the rental units without needing the owner's immediate approval, demonstrating their broader authority as a general agent. If the listing broker makes unauthorized promises to a buyer, the owner might not be bound, whereas the property manager's routine decisions typically do bind the owner.
More Agency Law Episodes
Continue learning with related audio lessons
In Washington, dual agency requires:
2:35 • 0 plays
Missouri requires agency disclosure:
2:11 • 0 plays
Connecticut real estate licensees are regulated by the:
2:35 • 0 plays
A broker provides services to both a buyer and a seller in a transaction without disclosing their dual agency status. This is an example of:
2:27 • 0 plays
North Carolina does NOT recognize which type of agency?
3:06 • 0 plays
Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?
Access 2,499+ free podcast episodes covering all 11 exam topics.