A broker who represents both the buyer and seller in the same transaction without the knowledge and consent of both parties is practicing:
Audio Lesson
Duration: 2:43
Question & Answer
Review the question and all answer choices
Dual agency
A is incorrect because dual agency requires the knowledge and consent of both parties, which is explicitly absent in this scenario. Without this consent, the situation cannot be legally classified as dual agency under California law.
Undisclosed dual agency
Single agency
C is incorrect because single agency involves representing only one party in a transaction, not both. The scenario clearly states the broker is representing both buyer and seller, which contradicts the definition of single agency.
Transaction brokerage
D is incorrect because transaction brokerage is a specific form of limited representation where the broker facilitates the transaction without representing either party. This doesn't match the scenario where the broker is actively representing both sides.
Why is this correct?
B is correct because undisclosed dual agency specifically refers to representing both buyer and seller without their knowledge and consent. This violates California's requirement for full disclosure and informed consent before establishing any dual agency relationship, making it both illegal and unethical.
Deep Analysis
AI-powered in-depth explanation of this concept
Agency relationships form the foundation of fiduciary duties in real estate transactions, making this concept crucial for both legal compliance and ethical practice. This question tests your understanding of agency representation types, specifically focusing on the critical element of informed consent. The core concept revolves around whether both parties know and agree to the broker's representation of both sides. To arrive at the correct answer, we must analyze each option through the lens of disclosure and consent. Dual agency (A) requires knowledge and consent from both parties, which is absent here. Single agency (C) involves representing only one party. Transaction brokerage (D) is a limited representation model without fiduciary duties. The question's challenge lies in distinguishing between legitimate dual agency and its unethical counterpart. This connects to broader knowledge of fiduciary duties, disclosure requirements, and the legal boundaries of representation in California real estate practice.
Knowledge Background
Essential context and foundational knowledge
Agency relationships in real estate establish fiduciary duties including loyalty, obedience, disclosure, confidentiality, accounting, and reasonable care. California's Civil Code and Department of Real Estate regulations strictly govern these relationships. Dual agency emerged as an exception to traditional single agency when a broker's office has valid listings and obtains buyers. However, California requires written consent from both parties before any dual agency can exist. This protection exists to prevent conflicts of interest that could compromise a broker's fiduciary duties to either party. The prohibition of undisclosed dual agency reflects the state's commitment to transparency and consumer protection in real transactions.
UDI = Undisclosed Dual Agency = Unethical, Disclosure-lss, Illegal
Remember UDI when you see a question about representing both parties without consent. The acronym reminds you this is Unethical, lacks Disclosure, and is Illegal.
Look for keywords like 'without knowledge and consent' or 'without disclosure' to identify undisclosed dual agency. Remember that proper dual agency requires written consent from both parties.
Real World Application
How this concept applies in actual real estate practice
Imagine a real estate agent showing a property listed by their brokerage to a buyer they've been working with. The agent doesn't inform the buyer that they work for the same company that represents the seller, nor do they inform the seller about their existing relationship with the buyer. They negotiate the deal, potentially favoring their brokerage's interests over their clients' best interests. This scenario represents undisclosed dual agency - the agent is representing both parties without disclosure or consent, creating a clear conflict of interest that violates California's real estate laws and professional ethics standards.
More Agency Law Episodes
Continue learning with related audio lessons
In Washington, dual agency requires:
2:35 • 0 plays
Missouri requires agency disclosure:
2:11 • 0 plays
Connecticut real estate licensees are regulated by the:
2:35 • 0 plays
A broker provides services to both a buyer and a seller in a transaction without disclosing their dual agency status. This is an example of:
2:27 • 0 plays
North Carolina does NOT recognize which type of agency?
3:06 • 0 plays
Ready to Ace Your Real Estate Exam?
Access 2,499+ free podcast episodes covering all 11 exam topics.