EstatePass
Ethics & Fraudhard17% of exam

A mortgage lender's statistical analysis shows that their denial rate for Native American applicants is 15% higher than for white applicants with similar credit profiles. However, the lender's overall portfolio performance is strong, and they argue this difference reflects unmeasured risk factors. Under current fair lending enforcement standards, this situation would:

Correct Answer

B) Require the lender to demonstrate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the disparity

Significant statistical disparities in lending outcomes between protected classes and control groups create a prima facie case of discrimination under disparate impact theory. The lender must then provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation for the disparity. Portfolio performance alone doesn't justify discriminatory outcomes, and unmeasured risk factors must be specifically identified and validated.

Answer Options
A
Be acceptable if the lender can document the unmeasured risk factors
B
Require the lender to demonstrate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the disparity
C
Be legal as long as individual decisions weren't based on race
D
Be permissible if the overall denial rate is within industry standards

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Significant statistical disparities in lending outcomes between protected classes and control groups create a prima facie case of discrimination under disparate impact theory. The lender must then provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation for the disparity. Portfolio performance alone doesn't justify discriminatory outcomes, and unmeasured risk factors must be specifically identified and validated.

More Ethics & Fraud Questions

People Also Study

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing