EstatePass
Federal Lawsmedium23% of exam

A borrower refinances a rental property they own and occupy as their primary residence 6 months per year. The lender treats it as an investment property and doesn't provide rescission rights. Is this correct?

Correct Answer

C) No, the borrower should have rescission rights if it's their principal dwelling

Under TILA Section 125, rescission rights apply when the borrower's 'principal dwelling' secures the loan. A principal dwelling is determined by where the borrower maintains their primary residence, not exclusively by rental status. If the borrower lives there as their primary residence for a substantial portion of the year, it may qualify as their principal dwelling.

Answer Options
A
Yes, rental properties never qualify for rescission rights
B
Yes, the property must be occupied year-round to qualify
C
No, the borrower should have rescission rights if it's their principal dwelling
D
No, any property owned by the borrower qualifies for rescission rights

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Under TILA Section 125, rescission rights apply when the borrower's 'principal dwelling' secures the loan. A principal dwelling is determined by where the borrower maintains their primary residence, not exclusively by rental status. If the borrower lives there as their primary residence for a substantial portion of the year, it may qualify as their principal dwelling.

More Federal Laws Questions

People Also Study

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing