EstatePass
Ethics ComplianceMisrepresentationNSWHARD

An agent repeats the vendor's claim that an extension was council-approved. It was not. The agent had seen council letters questioning the approval but did not follow them up. Can the agent rely on the s 52 defence?

Correct Answer

D) No; the defence needs no knowledge and no reasonable cause to suspect.

Section 52 of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 prohibits inducing a contract by a false or misleading statement, whether or not the agent knew it was false. Under s 52(3) it is a defence only if the agent proves they did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect it was false. Council letters questioning the approval gave reasonable cause to suspect.

Answer Options
A
Yes, because the agent honestly believed the vendor and did not know it was false.
B
Yes, because liability for the statement rests with the vendor who supplied the claim.
C
Yes, provided the contract included a clause excluding reliance on the agent's statements.
D
No; the defence needs no knowledge and no reasonable cause to suspect.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

The council letters gave reasonable cause to suspect, so the s 52(3) defence fails even though the agent believed the vendor.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Background Knowledge for Ethics Compliance

Exam Tip for Ethics Compliance

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Ethics Compliance Questions

Was this explanation helpful?

More Ethics Compliance Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 1,100+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions