EstatePass
Ethics ComplianceRepresentationsNSWMEDIUM

To win a listing on her preferred terms, an agent tells the owner that NSW law makes a 90-day exclusive period compulsory in every sale listing. It does not. What has she done?

Correct Answer

C) Breached the rule against falsely saying a term is required by the Act.

Rule 17 of Schedule 1 prohibits an agent from falsely representing the nature or effect of the Act or Regulation, or representing that a particular form or term of agency agreement is required by them. Recommending an exclusive term is fine; claiming the law demands it is not.

Answer Options
A
Nothing wrong, as long as the vendor could have checked the Act for herself.
B
Nothing wrong, because agents may recommend whatever term suits their campaign.
C
Breached the rule against falsely saying a term is required by the Act.
D
Breached only the Australian Consumer Law, as the Schedule 1 rules do not cover this.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Ethics Compliance

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Ethics Compliance Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Was this explanation helpful?

More Ethics Compliance Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 1,100+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions