A Victorian estate agent receives a verbal complaint from a buyer alleging the agent misrepresented the property's zoning. Under consumer protection obligations, what should the agent do?
Correct Answer
A) Record the complaint, look into the allegation, and respond to the buyer within a reasonable time.
Agents have a professional and legal obligation to properly handle complaints regardless of how they are received. Best practice and regulatory expectations require the agent to record the complaint, investigate the allegation, and provide a response within a reasonable timeframe. Failing to address complaints may escalate regulatory scrutiny.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
A complaint must be dealt with however it arrives. Recording it, investigating what the agent actually said about zoning, and responding within a reasonable time is the proper handling and gives the best chance of resolving it.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Consumer Protection Question
Background Knowledge for Consumer Protection
Memory Technique
Exam Tip for Consumer Protection
Real World Application in Consumer Protection
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Consumer Protection Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
More Consumer Protection Questions
Which authority would typically handle a consumer complaint about misleading advertising by a real estate agent in NSW?
A NSW vendor accepted Priya's offer verbally, and Priya paid an expression of interest deposit and a building and pest report. Before exchange, the vendor signed with another buyer at a higher price. What can Priya recover?
While listing a home, the agent learns that three years ago it was the scene of a manslaughter. The vendor asks the agent not to mention it to buyers unless they ask. What must the agent do?
A property manager is choosing between rental applicants. Which reason for declining an applicant is lawful under NSW anti-discrimination rules?
A property manager scans and stores a colour copy of every rental applicant's passport and driver licence 'just in case'. What does the Fair Trading Commissioner's guidance recommend?
- → A vendor's solicitor adds a special condition saying the purchaser cannot claim damages for any misrepresentation about the land. How effective is that clause in NSW?
- → A landlord tells his property manager to reject every applicant who is pregnant or has young children. The manager says she is only following instructions. What is her legal position?
- → An agent's brochure for a Penrith unit says 'This unit will double in value within five years'. The agent has no data behind the claim. How is the statement treated?
- → A NSW agent's listing for a Wollongong house highlights 'quiet street', but leaves out that a freight rail line runs behind the back fence, which the photos crop out. How is this assessed?
- → The Australian Consumer Law (ACL), as applied in Queensland, prohibits real estate agents from engaging in:
- → In Queensland, which government body handles consumer complaints about real estate agents?
- → A Queensland real estate agent tells a buyer that a property has been 'fully renovated' when the agent knows the plumbing and electrical work was not completed by licensed tradespeople. This is an example of:
- → Under Queensland law, the cooling-off period for residential property purchases serves to protect consumers by:
- → Under Queensland consumer protection law, 'unconscionable conduct' by a real estate agent may include:
- → A Queensland agent advertises a property at a price well below what the seller has said they will accept, to draw in more buyers. Under consumer protection law, this practice:
People Also Study
Property Law & Legislation
110 questions
Agency Practice & Law
138 questions
Contracts & Conveyancing
106 questions
Property Marketing & Sales
129 questions
Related Study Resources
Previous Question
A Victorian estate agent conducts a property auction where a dummy bidder (vendor bid not declared) is used to inflate the price. Under Victorian law, what are the potential consequences?
Next Question
A WA developer engages in 'bait advertising' by promoting properties at prices they have no intention of selling at. Under the Australian Consumer Law, what is the potential consequence?