A vendor instructs their agent not to disclose that the property is in a flood-prone area, claiming it's not relevant as no flooding has occurred recently. The agent knows this information would be material to purchasers. What is the agent's correct course of action?
Correct Answer
B) Refuse to continue with the agency unless the vendor agrees to proper disclosure
The agent must refuse to continue unless proper disclosure is made, as they cannot knowingly participate in misleading potential purchasers about material facts. Professional and legal obligations under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 require honest dealing and cannot be overridden by client instructions to withhold material information.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because under sections 72-73 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, agents have an overriding duty not to mislead or deceive any party. When a client instructs an agent to withhold material information like flood risk, the agent cannot comply without breaching their professional obligations. The only ethical course is to refuse to continue the agency relationship unless the vendor agrees to proper disclosure. This protects the agent from liability and maintains professional integrity.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Follow the vendor's instructions as they are the client and have the right to control disclosure
Following the vendor's instructions would breach the agent's duty under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 not to mislead or deceive. Client instructions cannot override statutory professional obligations, and the agent would face disciplinary action and potential liability for knowingly withholding material information from purchasers.
Option C: Disclose the information anyway as professional obligations override client instructions
While the agent has professional obligations, unilaterally disclosing against explicit client instructions would breach the agency relationship and fiduciary duties. The correct approach is to refuse to continue unless proper disclosure is agreed to, rather than acting without the client's consent.
Option D: Seek written indemnification from the vendor before proceeding without disclosure
Seeking indemnification doesn't resolve the fundamental issue that the agent would still be breaching their professional obligations under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Indemnification cannot protect against disciplinary action for misleading conduct, and the agent would still face potential liability to purchasers.
Deep Analysis of This Agency Practice Question
This question tests understanding of the fundamental tension between client loyalty and professional obligations under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. The scenario presents a classic ethical dilemma where a vendor's instructions conflict with the agent's duty to act honestly and transparently. The flood-prone nature of property is clearly material information that could significantly impact a purchaser's decision and the property's value. Under sections 72-73 of the REA 2008, agents must not mislead or deceive, and must exercise care, diligence and skill. The Act establishes that professional obligations cannot be waived by client instructions when they would result in misleading conduct. This principle protects both purchasers and the integrity of the real estate profession, ensuring agents cannot hide behind client instructions to justify withholding material facts.
Background Knowledge for Agency Practice
The Real Estate Agents Act 2008 establishes fundamental duties for licensed agents, particularly sections 72-73 requiring agents not to mislead or deceive any party and to exercise care, diligence and skill. Material facts are information that would reasonably be expected to influence a purchaser's decision or the property's value. Flood risk is typically considered material as it affects insurance, future resale value, and habitability. Agents owe fiduciary duties to clients but these cannot override statutory professional obligations. The Act prioritizes consumer protection and market integrity over client loyalty when conflicts arise.
Memory Technique
STOP: Stop the agency, Talk to vendor, Obligations come first, Professional integrity Protected. When client instructions conflict with professional duties, you must STOP the relationship rather than compromise your obligations. Remember: you can't STOP being professional, but you can STOP the agency.
When you see questions about conflicting client instructions and professional duties, think STOP. Ask yourself: would following the instruction require me to STOP being professional? If yes, then STOP the agency relationship instead.
Exam Tip for Agency Practice
Look for scenarios where client instructions conflict with disclosure duties. The answer is rarely 'follow client instructions' or 'disclose anyway' - it's usually 'refuse to continue unless proper disclosure is made'.
Real World Application in Agency Practice
An agent lists a property where the vendor reveals the house has had previous methamphetamine contamination that was remediated, but instructs the agent not to disclose this as 'it's been fixed.' The agent knows this is material information affecting value and insurability. Following the vendor's instruction would breach professional obligations, so the agent must refuse to continue marketing the property unless the vendor agrees to proper disclosure in the marketing materials and to potential purchasers.
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Practice Questions
- •Thinking client loyalty always overrides professional duties
- •Believing indemnification protects against professional misconduct
- •Assuming agents can unilaterally disclose against client instructions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
More Agency Practice Questions
Under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, what is the primary fiduciary duty that a real estate agent owes to their client?
What type of agency agreement allows a real estate agent to receive commission even if the property is sold by another agent?
Which licence category is required for a person to sign agency agreements on behalf of a real estate agency?
When must a real estate licensee disclose any personal interest in a property transaction?
Sarah, a licensed salesperson, discovers that a property she is marketing has a significant building defect that the vendor has not disclosed. What should she do?
- → Under a sole agency agreement, in which circumstance would the agent NOT be entitled to commission?
- → A real estate agent receives two offers on a property at the same time. What is their primary obligation?
- → Which of the following situations would create a conflict of interest requiring disclosure by a real estate licensee?
- → A branch manager discovers that one of their salespersons has been providing incomplete information to potential purchasers about a property's title restrictions. What is the branch manager's primary responsibility?
- → An agent has an exclusive agency agreement that expires in two days, but the vendor wants to extend it for another month with a different agent. The original agent claims they introduced a purchaser who is still negotiating. What determines the original agent's entitlement to commission?
- → Under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, what is the primary duty that a real estate agent owes to their client?
- → Which licence category allows a person to carry out real estate agency work on behalf of a licensed agent?
- → What must be included in every agency agreement under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008?
- → When must a real estate agent disclose that they have a personal interest in a property transaction?
- → Sarah, a licensed salesperson, discovers that her vendor client has not disclosed a known leaky roof issue. What should Sarah do?
People Also Study
Property Law & Legislation
130 questions
Sale & Purchase Process
130 questions
Professional Conduct & Ethics
110 questions
Property Management
90 questions
Related Study Resources
Previous Question
A vendor instructs their agent not to disclose a known building defect to potential purchasers. What should the agent do?
Next Question
A vendor instructs their agent not to disclose that the property was previously used for P-lab manufacturing, arguing that remediation work has been completed. How should the agent respond?