EstatePass
Property MarketingUnderquoting LegislationVICHARD

An agent in Victoria provides a price guide of '$800,000 - $880,000' but sets a reserve price of $950,000. Three comparable sales in the area have sold for $920,000, $935,000, and $965,000. What is the most likely regulatory outcome?

Correct Answer

C) A serious underquoting breach that can attract substantial penalties.

This represents a clear case of underquoting under Victorian legislation. The price guide is significantly below both the reserve price and recent comparable sales, which could mislead buyers about the property's true market value and expected selling price.

Answer Options
A
No breach, because the guide was based on the agent's own market research.
B
A minor issue, fixed simply by adjusting the guide before auction day.
C
A serious underquoting breach that can attract substantial penalties.
D
Acceptable, provided the reserve is disclosed to bidders before the auction starts.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

The quoted range sits well below both the recent comparable sales and the vendor's reserve, so it does not reflect a reasonable estimate of the selling price. That is underquoting under the Estate Agents Act 1980, which can attract substantial fines, loss of commission and disciplinary action.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Deep Analysis of This Property Marketing Question

Background Knowledge for Property Marketing

Memory Technique

Exam Tip for Property Marketing

Real World Application in Property Marketing

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Property Marketing Questions

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

underquotingprice guidereserve pricecomparable salesVictorian legislation
Was this explanation helpful?

More Property Marketing Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 1,100+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions