EstatePass
Professional ConductConflict Of Interestlevel4HARD

An agent receives two written offers on the same property at the same time: one from the agent's personal friend at $50,000 below the asking price, and one from an unknown buyer at the asking price. The agent presents only the friend's offer. Under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, this most likely amounts to:

Correct Answer

B) Misconduct involving dishonesty and breach of fiduciary duty, under s 73

The Act has two categories of breach: unsatisfactory conduct (s 72) and misconduct (s 73). Misconduct includes conduct that agents of good standing or reasonable members of the public would regard as disgraceful, and wilful breaches of the Act or Rules. Deliberately withholding a better written offer (rule 10.10) to favour a friend breaches the fiduciary duty (rule 6.1) and is dishonest, so misconduct is the likely finding.

Answer Options
A
Unsatisfactory conduct only, for failing to submit all offers promptly
B
Misconduct involving dishonesty and breach of fiduciary duty, under s 73
C
A minor administrative error with no disciplinary consequences at all
D
Acceptable practice, provided the friend's offer is genuine and in writing

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Section 73 defines misconduct to include conduct agents of good standing or the public would regard as disgraceful, and wilful breaches of the Act or Rules. Deliberately withholding a better written offer (rule 10.10) to favour a friend breaches the fiduciary duty (rule 6.1) and is dishonest.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Unsatisfactory conduct only, for failing to submit all offers promptly

Failing to submit offers is at least unsatisfactory conduct, but deliberately hiding a better offer to favour a friend goes further, into conduct that would be seen as disgraceful.

Option C: A minor administrative error with no disciplinary consequences at all

Withholding a written offer breaches rule 10.10; it is never an administrative slip without consequences.

Option D: Acceptable practice, provided the friend's offer is genuine and in writing

Rule 10.10 requires all written offers to be submitted; a genuine offer from a friend does not justify hiding the other one.

Deep Analysis of This Professional Conduct Question

The Real Estate Agents Act 2008 has two tiers. Unsatisfactory conduct (s 72) covers work below the standard of a reasonably competent licensee, breaches of the Act or Rules, and negligence. Misconduct (s 73) covers disgraceful conduct, seriously incompetent or negligent work, wilful or reckless breaches, and relevant convictions. Deliberate concealment of a superior offer to benefit a friend is intentional, dishonest and damaging to the client, which places it in the misconduct tier; only the Tribunal can decide a misconduct charge.

Background Knowledge for Professional Conduct

Real Estate Agents Act 2008: s 72 (unsatisfactory conduct), s 73 (misconduct), s 110 (Tribunal orders, including cancellation). Client Care Rules 2012: rule 6.1 (fiduciary obligations), rule 9.1 (best interests), rule 10.10 (submit all written offers). There is no separate category called 'serious misconduct'.

Memory Technique

Careless or below standard is s 72, unsatisfactory conduct. Deliberate, dishonest or disgraceful is s 73, misconduct.

Ask whether the licensee meant it. Deliberate concealment for personal reasons points to s 73.

Exam Tip for Professional Conduct

Intent and dishonesty move conduct from unsatisfactory (s 72) to misconduct (s 73). Watch for invented categories like 'serious misconduct'.

Real World Application in Professional Conduct

A salesperson receives a full-price offer and a lower offer from a business partner, tells the vendor only about the partner's offer, and says no other offers came in. The vendor later finds out. A Complaints Assessment Committee is likely to lay a misconduct charge before the Tribunal, which can cancel the licence.

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Professional Conduct Questions

  • •Treating deliberate concealment as mere carelessness
  • •Using the non-existent category 'serious misconduct'
  • •Thinking a genuine friend's offer justifies hiding a better one

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

fiduciary dutyserious misconductdishonestyconflict of interestdeliberate concealment
Was this explanation helpful?

More Professional Conduct Questions

People Also Study

Practice More NZ Questions

Access 600+ New Zealand real estate practice questions and prepare for your qualification assessments.

Browse All NZ Questions