EstatePass
Property MarketingUnderquoting LegislationHARD

An agent advertises a property price guide as '$1.2M - $1.32M' but the reserve is set at $1.4M. Three comparable sales in the area in the past 6 months were $1.35M, $1.41M, and $1.38M. What is the most serious legal issue with this marketing approach?

Correct Answer

D) The advertised range sits below both the reserve and the recent comparable sales.

This represents clear underquoting as the advertised price range ($1.2M-$1.32M) is significantly below both the reserve price ($1.4M) and recent comparable sales evidence ($1.35M-$1.41M). This misleading advertising could result in substantial penalties under consumer protection legislation and demonstrates a failure to provide realistic price guidance based on market evidence.

Answer Options
A
The price range is too narrow and must span at least 20% of the lower figure.
B
The agent needed written permission from the owners of the comparable properties.
C
Price guides are not permitted for properties valued above $1 million.
D
The advertised range sits below both the reserve and the recent comparable sales.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Property Marketing Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Property Marketing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Property Marketing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Property Marketing Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

underquotingmisleading advertisingAustralian Consumer Lawcomparable salesreserve price
Was this explanation helpful?

More Property Marketing Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 1,100+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions