A WA agent markets a property claiming it has 'ocean views' when the view is only partially visible from one upstairs window. What risk does the agent face?
Correct Answer
B) The agent risks a claim of misleading or deceptive conduct if the description creates a false impression of the extent of the views
Describing a property as having 'ocean views' when the view is minimal or only partially visible can constitute misleading or deceptive conduct. The overall impression created by the marketing must be consistent with reality. Agents should qualify such claims accurately, e.g., 'glimpse of ocean from upper level'.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Property Marketing Question
Background Knowledge for Property Marketing
Real World Application in Property Marketing
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Property Marketing Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
More Property Marketing Questions
What is the primary purpose of a reserve price at a property auction?
In a private treaty sale, when does the contract become legally binding?
What information must be included in property advertisements under Australian Consumer Law?
Which marketing method allows the vendor to negotiate with multiple potential purchasers simultaneously?
Under Victorian underquoting legislation, what is the maximum percentage a property can sell above the quoted price range before penalties may apply?
- → An agent quotes a property at '$800,000 - $850,000' but three comparable sales in the area sold for $920,000, $935,000, and $940,000 respectively in the past three months. What issue does this scenario present?
- → During an auction, when must the auctioneer announce whether the property is 'on the market'?
- → What is the main advantage of a tender sale method over an auction?
- → A property is advertised as having 'stunning harbour views' but the view is only partially visible from one bedroom window and significantly obstructed by neighbouring buildings. The agent has never personally inspected the property but relied on the vendor's description. What are the potential legal implications?
- → An agent conducting an expressions of interest campaign receives five offers ranging from $1.2M to $1.45M. The vendor initially indicated they wanted $1.3M but now wants to negotiate with only the top two bidders and exclude the others. What is the most appropriate course of action?
- → What is the cooling-off period for private treaty residential property purchases in NSW?
- → What is the primary purpose of a reserve price at a property auction?
- → Under private treaty sales, what does 'subject to finance' typically mean in a contract of sale?
- → Which advertising method is most commonly used for residential property marketing in Australia?
- → What is the main difference between an auction and an expression of interest campaign?
People Also Study
Property Law & Legislation
176 questions
Agency Practice & Law
176 questions
Contracts & Conveyancing
176 questions
Property Management
146 questions