EstatePass
Property MarketingVICMEDIUM

A Victorian estate agent quotes a residential property at '$750,000 to $800,000' in all marketing. The vendor's reserve price is $900,000 and the agent's own estimated selling price recorded in the authority is $890,000. Which underquoting rule has the agent breached?

Correct Answer

B) The quoted price is below the agent's own estimated selling price in the authority, constituting underquoting

Under Victorian underquoting laws, an agent must not quote a price in marketing that is less than the agent's estimated selling price recorded in the authority or any written offer already rejected by the vendor. Here, the quoted range ($750,000–$800,000) is significantly below the agent's own estimate ($890,000), constituting underquoting.

Answer Options
A
No rule is breached as price guides are only estimates
B
The quoted price is below the agent's own estimated selling price in the authority, constituting underquoting
C
The price range exceeds 10% and is therefore invalid
D
The agent must always quote the vendor's reserve price

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Property Marketing Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Property Marketing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Property Marketing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Property Marketing Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

underquotingestimated selling priceprice below agent's estimate
Was this explanation helpful?

More Property Marketing Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 520+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions