EstatePass
Resource ManagementPlanning Hierarchylevel4HARD

Under the Resource Management Act 1991, which of the following best describes the relationship between National Policy Statements and District Plans?

Correct Answer

A) District plans must give effect to national policy statements

Under RMA s 75(3), a district plan must give effect to any national policy statement, the New Zealand coastal policy statement, the national planning standards and the regional policy statement. National direction therefore sits above district plans, which must be brought into line with it. National environmental standards work differently: they are regulations that apply directly and prevail over plan rules.

Answer Options
A
District plans must give effect to national policy statements
B
National policy statements must be consistent with existing district plans
C
They operate independently, with no legal relationship between them
D
A district plan may override a national policy statement where that suits local conditions

Why This Is the Correct Answer

RMA s 75(3) says a district plan must give effect to any national policy statement, the New Zealand coastal policy statement, the national planning standards and the regional policy statement.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: National policy statements must be consistent with existing district plans

The hierarchy runs the other way. National direction sits above district plans, which must be brought into line with it.

Option C: They operate independently, with no legal relationship between them

RMA s 75(3) sets a direct legal relationship: a district plan must give effect to any national policy statement.

Option D: A district plan may override a national policy statement where that suits local conditions

Local conditions do not let a district plan override national direction. The plan must give effect to the national policy statement.

Deep Analysis of This Resource Management Question

This question tests understanding of the hierarchical planning framework under the Resource Management Act 1991. The RMA establishes a clear cascade of planning instruments from national to local level, ensuring consistent implementation of environmental policy across New Zealand. National Policy Statements (NPSs) represent the Government's direction on nationally significant resource management issues, while District Plans are local authority instruments that control land use activities. The relationship is deliberately hierarchical - national direction must flow down to local implementation. This prevents local authorities from undermining nationally important environmental outcomes through inconsistent local planning. Understanding this hierarchy is crucial for real estate professionals as it affects what can be developed where, and ensures that national priorities like freshwater management, urban development capacity, and renewable energy generation are consistently addressed across all territorial authorities regardless of local political preferences.

Background Knowledge for Resource Management

The Resource Management Act 1991 establishes a hierarchical planning framework with National Policy Statements at the top, followed by National Environmental Standards, Regional Policy Statements, Regional Plans, and District Plans. National Policy Statements are statutory instruments issued by the Minister for the Environment that provide direction on nationally significant resource management issues. They must be prepared under Schedule 1 of the RMA and become legally binding once gazetted. District Plans are prepared by territorial authorities under Section 73 and control land use activities within their boundaries. The hierarchical relationship ensures consistent implementation of national environmental policy while allowing for local variation within national parameters.

Memory Technique

Visualize a pyramid with National Policy Statements at the top flowing down to District Plans at the bottom. Remember 'National flows DOWN' - like water flowing downhill, national direction must flow down through the planning hierarchy. The higher levels 'give direction to' the lower levels, never the reverse.

When you see questions about relationships between planning instruments, draw a quick pyramid in your mind. The higher instrument always directs the lower one. If the question asks about NPSs and District Plans, remember NPSs are higher in the pyramid so they direct District Plans.

Exam Tip for Resource Management

Look for the phrase 'give effect to' in RMA hierarchy questions - this indicates the correct direction of the relationship. Higher planning instruments require lower ones to 'give effect to' them, never the reverse.

Real World Application in Resource Management

A territorial authority is reviewing its District Plan and wants to restrict intensive farming to protect local waterways. However, the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management requires specific provisions for freshwater protection that are more stringent than the council's proposed rules. The council must amend its District Plan to 'give effect to' the NPS requirements, even if this means stronger restrictions than initially planned. The council cannot simply ignore the NPS because it prefers a different local approach - the national direction takes precedence.

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Resource Management Questions

  • β€’Confusing 'give effect to' with 'have regard to' - the former is mandatory, the latter discretionary
  • β€’Thinking local authorities can override national direction if locally inappropriate
  • β€’Believing the hierarchy works both ways - that national instruments must consider local plans

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

National Policy StatementDistrict Plangive effect toRMA hierarchySection 75
Was this explanation helpful?

More Resource Management Questions

People Also Study

Practice More NZ Questions

Access 600+ New Zealand real estate practice questions and prepare for your qualification assessments.

Browse All NZ Questions