EstatePass
Resource ManagementPlanning Hierarchylevel4HARD

Under the Resource Management Act 1991, which of the following best describes the relationship between National Policy Statements and District Plans?

Correct Answer

A) District Plans must give effect to National Policy Statements

Under Section 75 of the RMA, district plans must give effect to National Policy Statements and National Environmental Standards. This creates a hierarchy where national direction flows down through regional policy statements to district and regional plans, ensuring nationally important matters are addressed at the local level.

Answer Options
A
District Plans must give effect to National Policy Statements
B
National Policy Statements must be consistent with District Plans
C
They operate independently with no legal relationship
D
District Plans can override National Policy Statements if locally appropriate

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Section 75(3)(a) of the RMA explicitly requires that district plans 'give effect to' any National Policy Statement. This creates a mandatory legal obligation for territorial authorities to ensure their district plans implement and are consistent with national direction. The phrase 'give effect to' is stronger than merely 'having regard to' - it requires active implementation of NPS objectives and policies. This hierarchical relationship ensures that nationally significant resource management issues receive consistent treatment across all local authorities, preventing a patchwork of inconsistent local approaches that could undermine national environmental outcomes.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: National Policy Statements must be consistent with District Plans

This reverses the correct hierarchy. National Policy Statements are developed by central government to provide direction to local authorities, not to conform to existing local plans. NPSs are designed to override inconsistent local provisions and establish national direction on important issues. If NPSs had to be consistent with existing District Plans, they would be ineffective as policy instruments and unable to drive necessary changes in local planning approaches.

Option C: They operate independently with no legal relationship

The RMA deliberately creates legal relationships between planning instruments through its hierarchical framework. Section 75 establishes clear obligations for district plans to give effect to NPSs, while other sections create relationships between regional policy statements, regional plans, and district plans. This interconnected system ensures policy coherence from national to local level rather than allowing independent operation that could create conflicts.

Option D: District Plans can override National Policy Statements if locally appropriate

District Plans cannot override National Policy Statements regardless of local circumstances. The RMA's hierarchy is designed to ensure national priorities take precedence over purely local preferences. While district plans can include additional local provisions, they cannot contradict or undermine NPS requirements. Local appropriateness is considered during NPS development, but once gazetted, NPSs must be implemented regardless of local preferences that might conflict with national direction.

Deep Analysis of This Resource Management Question

This question tests understanding of the hierarchical planning framework under the Resource Management Act 1991. The RMA establishes a clear cascade of planning instruments from national to local level, ensuring consistent implementation of environmental policy across New Zealand. National Policy Statements (NPSs) represent the Government's direction on nationally significant resource management issues, while District Plans are local authority instruments that control land use activities. The relationship is deliberately hierarchical - national direction must flow down to local implementation. This prevents local authorities from undermining nationally important environmental outcomes through inconsistent local planning. Understanding this hierarchy is crucial for real estate professionals as it affects what can be developed where, and ensures that national priorities like freshwater management, urban development capacity, and renewable energy generation are consistently addressed across all territorial authorities regardless of local political preferences.

Background Knowledge for Resource Management

The Resource Management Act 1991 establishes a hierarchical planning framework with National Policy Statements at the top, followed by National Environmental Standards, Regional Policy Statements, Regional Plans, and District Plans. National Policy Statements are statutory instruments issued by the Minister for the Environment that provide direction on nationally significant resource management issues. They must be prepared under Schedule 1 of the RMA and become legally binding once gazetted. District Plans are prepared by territorial authorities under Section 73 and control land use activities within their boundaries. The hierarchical relationship ensures consistent implementation of national environmental policy while allowing for local variation within national parameters.

Memory Technique

Visualize a pyramid with National Policy Statements at the top flowing down to District Plans at the bottom. Remember 'National flows DOWN' - like water flowing downhill, national direction must flow down through the planning hierarchy. The higher levels 'give direction to' the lower levels, never the reverse.

When you see questions about relationships between planning instruments, draw a quick pyramid in your mind. The higher instrument always directs the lower one. If the question asks about NPSs and District Plans, remember NPSs are higher in the pyramid so they direct District Plans.

Exam Tip for Resource Management

Look for the phrase 'give effect to' in RMA hierarchy questions - this indicates the correct direction of the relationship. Higher planning instruments require lower ones to 'give effect to' them, never the reverse.

Real World Application in Resource Management

A territorial authority is reviewing its District Plan and wants to restrict intensive farming to protect local waterways. However, the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management requires specific provisions for freshwater protection that are more stringent than the council's proposed rules. The council must amend its District Plan to 'give effect to' the NPS requirements, even if this means stronger restrictions than initially planned. The council cannot simply ignore the NPS because it prefers a different local approach - the national direction takes precedence.

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Resource Management Questions

  • Confusing 'give effect to' with 'have regard to' - the former is mandatory, the latter discretionary
  • Thinking local authorities can override national direction if locally inappropriate
  • Believing the hierarchy works both ways - that national instruments must consider local plans

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

National Policy StatementDistrict Plangive effect toRMA hierarchySection 75
Was this explanation helpful?

More Resource Management Questions

People Also Study

Practice More NZ Questions

Access 325+ New Zealand real estate practice questions and ace your REA licensing exam.

Browse All NZ Questions