EstatePass
Property MarketingUnderquoting LegislationMEDIUM

A property is advertised as 'Offers Over $800,000' but sells at auction for $950,000. The reserve price was set at $900,000. What is the most likely issue with this marketing approach?

Correct Answer

D) The advertised price was likely misleading, sitting well below the vendor's reserve.

Advertising 'Offers Over $800,000' when the vendor would not sell below $900,000 understates the vendor's expectations. NSW and Victoria have specific underquoting laws against advertising below the agent's estimate or the seller's asking price, and everywhere the Australian Consumer Law's ban on misleading conduct applies. The $950,000 sale simply confirms how far the advertising was from reality.

Answer Options
A
The reserve was set too far above the advertised price for the auction to proceed.
B
The sale price exceeded a legal cap on how far a sale may exceed the advertised price.
C
Properties going to auction are never allowed to use 'offers over' in their advertising.
D
The advertised price was likely misleading, sitting well below the vendor's reserve.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

An advertised price $100,000 below the reserve tells buyers the vendor will consider offers the vendor has already ruled out. That is likely misleading and, in NSW and Victoria, underquoting.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Deep Analysis of This Property Marketing Question

Background Knowledge for Property Marketing

Memory Technique

Exam Tip for Property Marketing

Real World Application in Property Marketing

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Property Marketing Questions

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

underquotingmisleading advertisingAustralian Consumer Lawreserve priceauction marketing
Was this explanation helpful?

More Property Marketing Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 1,100+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions