EstatePass
ComplianceFair Trading Actlevel4EASY

Under the Fair Trading Act 1986, which of the following would constitute misleading conduct by a real estate agent?

Correct Answer

A) Stating in an advert that a property has three bedrooms when it has two

Making false statements about factual matters such as the number of bedrooms constitutes misleading conduct under the Fair Trading Act. Agents must ensure all factual representations are accurate and truthful.

Answer Options
A
Stating in an advert that a property has three bedrooms when it has two
B
Saying the property has great potential, as an honestly held personal opinion
C
Giving a price range for the property based on recent comparable sales
D
Recommending that buyers get a building inspection before making an offer

Why This Is the Correct Answer

The number of bedrooms is a verifiable fact. Misstating it is a false representation about land under s 14 of the Fair Trading Act and misleading conduct under s 9, whatever the agent intended.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: Saying the property has great potential, as an honestly held personal opinion

An honestly held opinion with a reasonable basis is not misleading; general talk about potential is not a statement of fact.

Option C: Giving a price range for the property based on recent comparable sales

A range supported by comparable sales is a reasoned estimate, and rule 10.2 expects appraisals to rest on comparable data.

Option D: Recommending that buyers get a building inspection before making an offer

Recommending an inspection helps buyers protect themselves and misleads no one.

Deep Analysis of This Compliance Question

This question tests understanding of misleading conduct under the Fair Trading Act 1986, a critical piece of consumer protection legislation that applies to real estate transactions. The Act prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade, requiring agents to ensure all factual statements are accurate. The distinction between factual representations and opinions is fundamental - while agents can express professional opinions and provide estimates, they cannot misstate objective facts. This principle protects consumers from being deceived about property characteristics that directly affect value and suitability. Understanding this distinction is essential for maintaining professional standards and avoiding legal liability. The question also highlights the importance of verification processes in real estate practice, where agents must confirm property details before marketing.

Background Knowledge for Compliance

The Fair Trading Act 1986 prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade (s 9) and false or misleading representations about land (s 14). Opinions are not automatically safe: an opinion that is not genuinely held or has no reasonable basis can mislead. The Commerce Commission enforces the Act, and offences carry fines of up to $600,000 for a company.

Memory Technique

Remember FACT: False About Characteristics = Trouble. If it's a measurable, verifiable property characteristic (bedrooms, bathrooms, land size, age), it must be accurate. Opinions about potential, value estimates, and professional recommendations are generally acceptable if clearly presented as such and based on reasonable grounds.

When you see Fair Trading Act questions, immediately categorize each option as either a FACT (must be 100% accurate) or OPINION (can be subjective if reasonable). False facts always constitute misleading conduct, while genuine opinions based on reasonable grounds typically don't.

Exam Tip for Compliance

Look for objective, measurable property characteristics in the options - these must always be accurate. Distinguish between factual statements (bedroom count, land size) and professional opinions (value estimates, potential assessments).

Real World Application in Compliance

An agent lists a property advertising 'three bedrooms' but the third room lacks a window and doesn't meet building code requirements for a bedroom. A buyer purchases based on the three-bedroom representation, later discovering they can't use the third room as intended. The buyer could claim damages under the Fair Trading Act for the misleading representation, as bedroom count is a factual matter that directly affects property value and suitability.

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Compliance Questions

  • β€’Confusing opinions with factual statements
  • β€’Assuming all agent statements are protected as 'opinions'
  • β€’Not verifying property details before marketing

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

Fair Trading Actmisleading conductfactual representationsfalse statementsconsumer protection
Was this explanation helpful?

More Compliance Questions

People Also Study

Practice More NZ Questions

Access 600+ New Zealand real estate practice questions and prepare for your qualification assessments.

Browse All NZ Questions