EstatePass
Residential TradingCondominium LeasingONEASY

A condominium owner's lease with her tenant contains an extra term banning all pets. The condominium declaration contains no pet restriction, and the tenant brings home a cat. Under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, is the lease term enforceable?

Correct Answer

A) No, a no-pet term in a lease is void

Section 14 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 says a provision in a tenancy agreement prohibiting the presence of animals in or about the residential complex is void. Since the declaration has no restriction, nothing else stops the tenant from keeping the cat.

Answer Options
A
No, a no-pet term in a lease is void
B
Yes, because the tenant signed the lease containing that term
C
Yes, because a landlord may add any term to the standard lease
D
Only if the landlord gave the tenant 60 days' written notice first

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Residential Trading Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Residential Trading

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Residential Trading

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Residential Trading Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Key Terms

no-pet clauseRTA section 14void termcondominium lease
Was this explanation helpful?

More Residential Trading Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Residential Trading Questions

Access 540+ Canadian real estate exam questions and pass your licensing exam.

Start Practicing