EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 4.1 · 10% of the exam

A client who bought a segregated fund contract in Ontario has now moved permanently to Quebec. The agent should:

  • Areissue the contract in Quebec, which requires a full new application and a new deposit
  • Bdo nothing, because a change of province has no effect on any aspect of the contract
  • review the beneficiary designation, since Quebec rules on designations differ in important ways
  • Dtreat the contract as void, since it was issued under the law of a different province

Correct answer: C) review the beneficiary designation, since Quebec rules on designations differ in important ways

Quebec treats designations differently, particularly the presumption that a spouse designation is irrevocable unless stated otherwise. A review on relocation ensures the designation still reflects what the client actually intends.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AA move does not require a new contract or a new deposit.
  • BDesignation rules and family law differ enough that a review is warranted.
  • DA validly issued contract is not voided by the holder moving province.

Exam tip

A move to or from Quebec should always trigger a beneficiary designation review.

Common mistake

Assuming designation rules are identical across every province.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 4.1 — Provide customer service during the validity period of the coverage — which is weighted at 10% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 4

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.