EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 4.1 · 10% of the exam

A client asks to add her adult son as a joint owner of her non-registered segregated fund contract. The agent should explain that:

  • Aadding an owner is a simple administrative change with no tax or legal consequence at all
  • Bthe insurer will refuse, since segregated fund contracts may only ever have a single owner
  • transferring part of the ownership can trigger a disposition and affect who controls the contract
  • Djoint ownership is added automatically whenever an adult child is named as beneficiary

Correct answer: C) transferring part of the ownership can trigger a disposition and affect who controls the contract

Giving away part of the ownership of a non-registered contract is a disposition of that share for tax purposes, and the new owner gains rights over the contract. The client should take tax and legal advice before proceeding.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AA change of ownership has both tax and control consequences that must be explained.
  • BJoint ownership is available where the jurisdiction and the insurer permit it.
  • DA beneficiary designation is entirely separate from ownership of the contract.

Exam tip

Adding an owner to a non-registered contract is a disposition, not an administrative edit.

Common mistake

Treating an ownership change as paperwork rather than as a transfer of property.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 4.1 — Provide customer service during the validity period of the coverage — which is weighted at 10% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 4

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.