EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 4.1 · 10% of the exam

A client holds two non-registered segregated fund contracts with the same insurer and asks to merge them into one. The agent should explain that:

  • Athe insurer is obliged to merge the contracts on request under the applicable regulations
  • Bmerging is automatic once both contracts are with the same insurer and the same owner
  • Cthe guarantees of both contracts would be added together with no other consequence at all
  • combining them generally means redeeming one, which triggers tax and restarts its guarantee

Correct answer: D) combining them generally means redeeming one, which triggers tax and restarts its guarantee

Each contract has its own deposits, guaranteed amounts and maturity dates. Collapsing one to fund the other is a taxable disposition and starts a new guarantee period, so the administrative tidiness usually costs more than it is worth.

Why the other options are wrong

  • ANo regulation requires an insurer to merge existing contracts.
  • BNothing merges automatically; contracts remain separate agreements.
  • CGuarantees attach to their own contract and do not simply combine.

Exam tip

Consolidating non-registered contracts is a disposition, not an administrative merge.

Common mistake

Recommending consolidation for simplicity without pricing the tax and lost guarantee.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 4.1 — Provide customer service during the validity period of the coverage — which is weighted at 10% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 4

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.