EstatePass

LLQP Life Insurance · Component 3.1 · 25% of the exam

Which underwriting outcome is appropriate for an applicant recently diagnosed with a serious condition whose prognosis is not yet clear?

  • AImmediate issue with no evidence, since the applicant's condition has already been diagnosed and is being treated
  • Postponement until the condition is treated and stabilized, with a suggested reapplication date
  • CPreferred issue, since an applicant who is under a specialist's care is monitored more closely than most
  • DStandard issue with a two-year exclusion for the condition, after which full coverage applies automatically

Correct answer: B) Postponement until the condition is treated and stabilized, with a suggested reapplication date

When the risk cannot be assessed, underwriters postpone rather than decline. The agent should record the reason and the reapplication timeline, and consider interim options.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AIssuing without evidence would be reckless.
  • CPreferred is out of reach for an unresolved serious condition.
  • DStandard issue requires an assessable, standard risk.

Exam tip

Unclear prognosis → postpone, not decline. Track the reapplication date.

Common mistake

Treating a postponement as the end of the road.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.1 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Life Insurance module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Life Insurance module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.