EstatePass

LLQP Life Insurance · Component 1.3 · 35% of the exam

In the income replacement approach, why is the survivors' income target usually set below 100% of the deceased's income?

  • Because some expenses, such as the deceased's own consumption, end at death, so less than full income is needed
  • BBecause insurers limit death benefits to a percentage of income, so the analysis must stay within what can be issued
  • CBecause survivors should live more modestly after a death, so the analysis builds in a reduction in their standard of living over time
  • DBecause inflation reduces the value of the income over time, so the target is set lower to reflect the shrinking real amount

Correct answer: A) Because some expenses, such as the deceased's own consumption, end at death, so less than full income is needed

The target is the survivors' needs, not the deceased's income. Expenses attributable to the deceased disappear. A common working assumption is a fraction of prior income, adjusted for the family's actual budget.

Why the other options are wrong

  • BThe target is set by the family's need, not by insurer limits.
  • CThe goal is to maintain the standard of living, not reduce it.
  • DInflation raises, not lowers, the need over time.

Exam tip

Replace the survivors' needs, which are usually a fraction of the deceased's income; but build the figure from the family's budget, not a rule of thumb.

Common mistake

Setting the target at 100% of income without removing the deceased's own expenses.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.3 — Assess the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 35% of the Life Insurance module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Life Insurance module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.