EstatePass

LLQP Life Insurance · Component 1.3 · 35% of the exam

For a two-income couple with no children and no debt, the needs analysis is likely to show:

  • AA need for permanent insurance only, since a couple without children has no temporary needs to cover
  • A modest need for final expenses and perhaps a period of income adjustment, since each can support themselves
  • CA very large need for each spouse, since two incomes mean the household has twice as much to lose
  • DNo need for any review, since a couple with no children and no debt has nothing for insurance to protect and can save the premium

Correct answer: B) A modest need for final expenses and perhaps a period of income adjustment, since each can support themselves

Severity of risk is about the survivor's financial dependence. With two incomes and no dependants, death is a loss but not a financial catastrophe, so the analysis yields a smaller number — which the agent should present honestly.

Why the other options are wrong

  • APermanent insurance is not indicated by the facts given.
  • CTwo self-supporting incomes do not create a large need.
  • DEvery client benefits from a review; a modest need is still a need.

Exam tip

Severity of risk drives the number. Two incomes and no dependants produce a modest need — present it honestly.

Common mistake

Inflating the need for a couple who could each support themselves.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.3 — Assess the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 35% of the Life Insurance module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Life Insurance module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.