EstatePass

LLQP Life Insurance · Component 1.3 · 35% of the exam

After completing the calculations, the agent finds the client's existing coverage exceeds the total need. The correct conclusion is that:

  • AThe client must buy more anyway, since coverage should always exceed the calculated need by a safety margin
  • There is no current shortfall; the agent should document this and revisit at the next review or life change
  • CThe analysis must be wrong, since a properly completed needs analysis always shows some shortfall to address
  • DThe client is over-insured and the agent should recommend cancelling all coverage to save the premiums

Correct answer: B) There is no current shortfall; the agent should document this and revisit at the next review or life change

A needs analysis can and sometimes does show no shortfall. The professional response is to say so, record it, and schedule a review — needs change with children, mortgages, businesses and divorce. Recommending cancellation is a separate analysis of whether the existing coverage should be kept.

Why the other options are wrong

  • ASelling more coverage when none is needed is unsuitable.
  • CA surplus is a legitimate outcome, not evidence of error.
  • DA surplus is not a reason to cancel everything.

Exam tip

Suitability includes recommending nothing. Document the surplus and schedule a review.

Common mistake

Finding a reason to sell when the analysis shows no shortfall.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.3 — Assess the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 35% of the Life Insurance module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Life Insurance module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.