EstatePass

LLQP Life Insurance · Component 1.1 · 35% of the exam

A single parent with two children and no other adult in the household asks how her situation differs, for insurance purposes, from a two-parent family.

  • Her death would remove the children's only income and care at once, so income replacement and a guardian arrangement need attention
  • BSingle parents cannot buy life insurance, since there is no adult beneficiary to receive the proceeds
  • COnly the children need to be insured, since the parent's death would be covered by government benefits
  • DIt does not differ, since the needs analysis uses the same formula for every household regardless of how many adults it contains

Correct answer: A) Her death would remove the children's only income and care at once, so income replacement and a guardian arrangement need attention

With one adult, the severity of risk is at its highest: there is no second earner or caregiver. The needs analysis must fund the children's support to independence and the beneficiary structure must route money to whoever will raise them, usually through a trust.

Why the other options are wrong

  • BSingle parents are insured like anyone else.
  • CInsuring children does not replace a parent's income.
  • DA single-parent household has no second earner; the situation differs sharply.

Exam tip

Single parent = maximum severity of risk. Pair the amount with a trustee designation so proceeds reach the children's guardian.

Common mistake

Naming minor children as beneficiaries without a trustee.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.1 — Assess the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 35% of the Life Insurance module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Life Insurance module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.