EstatePass

LLQP Life Insurance · Component 1.3 · 35% of the exam

A needs analysis assumes the surviving spouse would move from full-time to part-time work to care for young children. The effect is that:

  • the income replacement need rises, since less household income would be earned
  • Bthe need is unchanged, because the survivor's own income is never part of the calculation
  • Cthe analysis becomes invalid, since it cannot model a change in working hours
  • Dthe income replacement need falls, because the survivor would have more free time

Correct answer: A) the income replacement need rises, since less household income would be earned

Replacement income must cover the gap between what the household needs and what the survivor would actually earn. A deliberate reduction in hours widens that gap and should be built into the assumptions.

Why the other options are wrong

  • BThe survivor's expected earnings are central to the calculation.
  • CChanged working hours are a standard assumption in an analysis.
  • DFewer hours worked means less income, not a smaller need.

Exam tip

Model the survivor's actual expected earnings, not their current ones.

Common mistake

Assuming a survivor continues working exactly as before.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.3 — Assess the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 35% of the Life Insurance module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Life Insurance module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.