EstatePass

LLQP Life Insurance · Component 1.3 · 35% of the exam

A client's needs analysis shows a shortfall, but he already has enough liquid investments to cover it. The correct conclusion is:

  • AHe must still buy insurance for the full shortfall, since investments can lose value and cannot be counted
  • BHe should sell the investments now and hold cash, so the money is certain to be available to the survivors
  • The investments reduce or eliminate the shortfall, though he may prefer insurance to preserve them for other goals
  • DInvestments cannot be counted in a needs analysis, since only insurance proceeds are guaranteed to be available at death

Correct answer: C) The investments reduce or eliminate the shortfall, though he may prefer insurance to preserve them for other goals

Available resources offset needs. A wealthy client may choose insurance anyway — to keep investments intact, for tax efficiency, or because insurance is cheaper than depleting capital — but that is a choice, not a shortfall.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AResources offset the need.
  • BSelling now solves nothing and is not the agent's call.
  • DLiquid investments are a legitimate resource.

Exam tip

Resources reduce the need; preference may still favour insurance. Distinguish need from choice.

Common mistake

Ignoring the client's assets when calculating the shortfall.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.3 — Assess the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 35% of the Life Insurance module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Life Insurance module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.