EstatePass

LLQP Ethics & Professional Practice · Component 1.5 · 60% of the exam

A shareholder personally owns a policy and wants his corporation named as beneficiary. The agent should warn that:

  • Aa corporation is not permitted to be the beneficiary of a personally owned policy
  • the mismatch between owner and beneficiary can create a shareholder benefit, so tax advice is needed
  • Cthe arrangement is straightforward and has no tax consequence for anyone involved
  • Dthe corporation would then be obliged to pay all of the premiums falling due on the contract

Correct answer: B) the mismatch between owner and beneficiary can create a shareholder benefit, so tax advice is needed

Where the corporation benefits from a policy whose premiums are paid personally, or the reverse, tax consequences can follow. These structures need an accountant's review before the designation is put in place.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AA corporation may be designated; the question is the tax treatment.
  • COwner and beneficiary mismatches between related parties carry tax risk.
  • DDesignation as beneficiary does not create an obligation to pay premiums.

Exam tip

Any owner and beneficiary mismatch involving a corporation needs tax advice.

Common mistake

Arranging a corporate beneficiary on a personal policy without tax review.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.5 — Integrate into practice the legal aspects of insurance and annuity contracts — which is weighted at 60% of the Ethics & Professional Practice module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Ethics & Professional Practice module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.