EstatePass

LLQP Accident & Sickness · Component 3.2 · 25% of the exam

A group client wants to reduce the cost of its benefits plan. The design change most likely to preserve catastrophic protection is:

  • AReducing the long-term disability replacement percentage to a level well below the group's average need
  • BReducing the long-term disability benefit period from age sixty-five to two years
  • Increasing the extended health deductible and co-insurance while keeping the disability design intact
  • DRemoving the long-term disability benefit and retaining the short-term plan only

Correct answer: C) Increasing the extended health deductible and co-insurance while keeping the disability design intact

Trimming the frequent, low-severity benefits preserves the layer that protects members against financial catastrophe, which is the purpose of the plan.

Why the other options are wrong

  • ACutting the percentage weakens the catastrophic layer rather than the routine one.
  • BA two-year benefit period removes exactly the protection that matters most.
  • DDropping long-term disability leaves members exposed to the severest risk.

Exam tip

Save money on frequency, not on severity.

Common mistake

Cutting the long-term disability benefit to fund richer dental coverage.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.2 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Accident & Sickness module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Accident & Sickness module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.