EstatePass

LLQP Accident & Sickness · Component 1.3 · 35% of the exam

A client in a physically demanding trade cannot afford full disability coverage. The needs analysis should consider:

  • AInsuring his spouse instead, since a policy on the lower-risk life costs less for the same benefit
  • Accident-only coverage as an interim layer, with its limits clearly explained
  • CDropping coverage altogether, since partial protection creates a false sense of security
  • DA critical illness policy instead, since it will pay whatever causes the client to stop work

Correct answer: B) Accident-only coverage as an interim layer, with its limits clearly explained

Accident-only coverage is cheaper and genuinely useful in a trade where injury is the dominant cause of claim, provided the client understands that illness is not covered.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AInsuring the wrong life leaves the household's main income unprotected.
  • CSome protection against the likeliest cause of loss is better than none.
  • DCritical illness pays only on listed conditions, not on any cause of work stoppage.

Exam tip

Accident-only is a compromise, not a substitute; say so plainly.

Common mistake

Presenting accident-only coverage as full disability protection.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 1.3 — Assess the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 35% of the Accident & Sickness module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 1

Practice the whole Accident & Sickness module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.