EstatePass

LLQP Accident & Sickness · Component 3.2 · 25% of the exam

A client asks whether to buy a CI rider on her life policy or a stand-alone CI policy. The recommendation should weigh:

  • AOnly the insurer's brand, since the client will trust a company whose name she recognizes
  • BOnly price, since the covered conditions are standardized across the industry
  • Breadth of conditions, amount limits, dependence on the base policy, conversion and ROP, and price
  • DNothing, since a rider and a stand-alone policy are identical in every respect but the paperwork

Correct answer: C) Breadth of conditions, amount limits, dependence on the base policy, conversion and ROP, and price

The rider-versus-policy decision is a recommendation classic. Riders suit budget-constrained or secondary needs; stand-alone suits a primary CI need.

Why the other options are wrong

  • ABrand is not suitability.
  • BPrice is one factor among several; scope and independence matter more.
  • DThey differ in scope and independence.

Exam tip

Primary CI need → stand-alone; secondary/budget → rider.

Common mistake

Recommending a CI rider without noting it depends on the base policy staying in force.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.2 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Accident & Sickness module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Accident & Sickness module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.