Free video lesson · Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 2.2
A guarantee is not the same as account value
Explain how withdrawals and contract terms can change a segregated fund guarantee.
Practice component 2.2 next. Free account, no card. Your answers and progress are saved.
The practice question in this lesson
A segregated fund's 'guaranteed amount' after a partial withdrawal under proportional reduction is:
- a. Reset to zero, since any withdrawal before maturity is treated as a surrender of the guaranteeWhy not: Only a full surrender ends it.
- b. Unchanged, since the guarantee is a percentage of deposits and deposits are not affected by a withdrawalWhy not: Withdrawals always reduce it.
- c. Reduced by the same percentage the withdrawal represents of market value at the time
- d. Reduced by the cash amount withdrawn, so the guarantee always equals deposits less withdrawalsWhy not: That is dollar-for-dollar.
What the lesson covers
- 01
The client
Priya puts one hundred thousand dollars into a segregated fund with a seventy-five percent maturity guarantee. So the contract guarantees her seventy-five thousand dollars at maturity. Two years later the market has fallen, and her fund is worth sixty thousand. She needs fifteen thousand for a new roof. She assumes her guarantee simply drops by the same fifteen thousand, to sixty thousand. If her contract uses proportional reduction, that is not what happens.
- 02
Two numbers
A segregated fund carries two different numbers. The market value is what the fund is worth today, and it moves. The guaranteed amount is the floor the contract promises at maturity or on death. A withdrawal comes out of the market value. The contract decides what it does to the guarantee.
- 03
The method
Step one: what share of the fund is she taking out? Fifteen thousand out of sixty thousand is twenty-five percent. Step two: the guarantee shrinks by that same twenty-five percent. Seventy-five thousand, reduced by a quarter, leaves fifty-six thousand two hundred and fifty.
- 04
Why it matters
Look at the gap. She took fifteen thousand in cash, but her guarantee fell by eighteen thousand seven hundred and fifty. When the market value is below the guarantee, proportional reduction takes more guarantee than the dollars withdrawn. When the market is above the guarantee, it takes less. Either way, the percentage drives the math, not the dollar amount.
- 05
Exam move
Here is how the exam asks it. Reset to zero? No. Only a full surrender ends the guarantee. Unchanged? No. A withdrawal always reduces it. Reduced by the cash withdrawn? That is the dollar-for-dollar method, a different rule. Reduced by the same percentage the withdrawal represents of market value. That is the answer.
- 06
Takeaway
Remember it as one line: the new guarantee equals the old guarantee, times one minus the withdrawal divided by the market value. With a real client, the contract sets the method, so read it before you run the numbers.
In your free dashboard
More Segregated Funds & Annuities lessons
Create a free account to watch them alongside your practice.
More free LLQP lessons
All lessonsKeep going with Segregated Funds & Annuities
A free account gives you 20 practice questions and one timed mock exam a day, with an explanation for every option and your wrong answers saved for review.
- Practice by module and CISRO component
- Timed mock exams built to the CISRO blueprint
- Your progress kept across devices



