Public data / Reporting periods
LLQP Provider Pass Rates
Filter first-attempt LLQP results by module, then compare the percentage with the number of candidates behind it. These figures describe past candidates; they cannot tell you which provider will be best for you.
These periods overlap. Differences are not a year-over-year measure of provider quality.
CISRO source: September 2025–August 2026 ↗Source checked 2026-10-02.
13 providers shown. Percentages are rounded as published by CISRO.
| Course provider | Candidates | Passed first time |
|---|---|---|
| Olivers-WFG | 7,396 | 75% |
| Primerica | 2,916 | 55% |
| Real Estate and Mortgage Institute of Canada (REMIC) | 2,721 | 79% |
| SeeWhy Learning | 2,525 | 84% |
| SeeWhy Learning-WFG | 1,810 | 78% |
| Oliver Publishing | 1,363 | 88% |
| Industrielle Alliance | 1,155 | 72% |
| CSI | 592 | 99% |
| Business Career College | 584 | 86% |
| ADVOCIS — Financial Advisors Association of Canada | 578 | 90% |
| Learnedly Canada Inc. | 301 | 91% |
| Collège des professions financières | 70 | 94% |
| Beneva | 49 | 92% |
A high pass rate is not a guarantee. Compare course format, support, cost, and accreditation too.
Create a free study account →How to read this data
CISRO reports first-attempt pass rates by the candidate’s course provider, not a randomized test of teaching quality. Candidate mix, preparation, delivery format, and sample size can all affect results. “Not reported” means CISRO suppresses a provider/module result involving fewer than 30 candidates; never treat it as 0%. Candidates may appear in more than one module, so module counts are not unique people.
Source: CISRO reporting-period archive ↗. The selected period’s original report is linked above. Calendar 2025 remains available as a historical snapshot; it has not been relabelled as 2026 data.